From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, bhelgaas@google.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
robherring2@gmail.com, panto@antoniou-consulting.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/42] powerpc/powernv: Create PEs dynamically
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 14:59:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150815045948.GA27636@gwshan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CDF2AC.2090908@ozlabs.ru>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:52:44PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 08/06/2015 02:11 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>Currently, the PEs and their associated resources are assigned
>>in ppc_md.pcibios_fixup() except those consumed by SRIOV VFs.
>>The function is called for once after PCI probing and resources
>>assignment is finished which isn't hotplug friendly.
>>
>>The patch creates PEs dynamically by ppc_md.pcibios_setup_bridge(),
>>which is called on the event during system bootup and PCI hotplug:
>>updating PCI bridge's windows after resource assignment/reassignment
>>are finished. For partial hotplug case, where not all PCI devices
>>belonging to the PE are unplugged and plugged again, we just need
>>unbinding/binding the affected PCI devices with the corresponding
>>PE without creating new one.
>>
>>Besides, it might require additional resources (e.g. M32) to the
>>windows of the PCI bridge when unplugging current adapter, and
>>insert a different adapter if there is one PCI slot, which is
>>assumed behind root port, or the downstream bridge of the PCIE
>>switch behind root port. The parent bridge of the newly plugged
>>adapter would reject the request to add more resources, leading
>>to hotplug failure. For the issue, the patch extends the windows
>>of root port, or the upstream port of the PCIe switch behind root
>>port to PHB's windows when ppc_md.pcibios_setup_bridge() is called.
>>
>>There is no upstream bridge for root bus, so we have to fix it up
>>before any PE is created because the root bus PE is the ancestor
>>to anyone else.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>index 8aa6ab8..37847a3 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>@@ -1083,6 +1083,13 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>> pci_name(dev));
>> continue;
>> }
>>+
>>+ /* The PCI device might be not detached from the
>>+ * PE in partial hotplug case.
>>+ */
>>+ if (pdn->pe_number != IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>> pdn->pe_number = pe->pe_number;
>> pe->dma32_weight += pnv_ioda_dma_weight(dev);
>> if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL) && dev->subordinate)
>>@@ -1101,9 +1108,27 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = NULL;
>>+ int pe_num;
>>+
>>+ /* For partial hotplug case, the PE instance hasn't been destroyed
>>+ * yet. We shouldn't allocated a new one and assign resources to
>>+ * it. The existing PE instance should be reused, but we should
>>+ * associate the devices to the PE.
>>+ */
>>+ pe_num = phb->ioda.pe_rmap[bus->number << 8];
>>+ if (pe_num != IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_num];
>>+ pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(bus, pe);
>>+ return NULL;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ /* PE number for root bus should have been reserved */
>>+ if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) &&
>>+ phb->ioda.root_pe_idx != IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[phb->ioda.root_pe_idx];
>>
>> /* Check if PE is determined by M64 */
>>- if (phb->pick_m64_pe)
>>+ if (!pe && phb->pick_m64_pe)
>
>
>else if (phb->pick_m64_pe)
>
No. When this function is called for the root of root bus, the PE
should have been reserved. So we still have to check @pe.
>
>
>> pe = phb->pick_m64_pe(bus, all);
>>
>> /* The PE number isn't pinned by M64 */
>>@@ -1150,46 +1175,6 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> return pe;
>> }
>>
>>-static void pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>-{
>>- struct pci_dev *dev;
>>-
>>- pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(bus, false);
>>-
>>- list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>>- if (dev->subordinate) {
>>- if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE)
>>- pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(dev->subordinate, true);
>>- else
>>- pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(dev->subordinate);
>>- }
>>- }
>>-}
>>-
>>-/*
>>- * Configure PEs so that the downstream PCI buses and devices
>>- * could have their associated PE#. Unfortunately, we didn't
>>- * figure out the way to identify the PLX bridge yet. So we
>>- * simply put the PCI bus and the subordinate behind the root
>>- * port to PE# here. The game rule here is expected to be changed
>>- * as soon as we can detected PLX bridge correctly.
>>- */
>>-static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)
>>-{
>>- struct pci_controller *hose, *tmp;
>>- struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>-
>>- list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
>>- phb = hose->private_data;
>>-
>>- /* M64 layout might affect PE allocation */
>>- if (phb->reserve_m64_pe)
>>- phb->reserve_m64_pe(hose->bus, NULL, true);
>>-
>>- pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(hose->bus);
>>- }
>>-}
>>-
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>>@@ -2962,52 +2947,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg(struct pci_controller *hose,
>> }
>> }
>>
>>-static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_seg(void)
>>-{
>>- struct pci_controller *tmp, *hose;
>>- struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>-
>>- list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
>>- phb = hose->private_data;
>>- list_for_each_entry(pe, &phb->ioda.pe_list, list) {
>>- pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg(hose, pe);
>>- }
>>- }
>>-}
>>-
>>-static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_DMA(void)
>>-{
>>- struct pci_controller *hose, *tmp;
>>- struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>-
>>- list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
>>- phb = hose->private_data;
>>- pnv_pci_ioda_setup_opal_tce_kill(phb);
>>-
>>- list_for_each_entry(pe, &phb->ioda.pe_dma_list, dma_link) {
>>- if (!pe->dma32_weight)
>>- continue;
>>-
>>- switch (phb->type) {
>>- case PNV_PHB_IODA1:
>>- pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(phb, pe);
>>- break;
>>- case PNV_PHB_IODA2:
>>- pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
>>- break;
>>- default:
>>- pr_warn("%s: No DMA for PHB type %d\n",
>>- __func__, phb->type);
>>- }
>>- }
>>-
>>- /* Mark the PHB initialization done */
>>- phb->initialized = 1;
>>- }
>>-}
>>-
>> static void pnv_pci_ioda_create_dbgfs(void)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>>@@ -3029,9 +2968,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_create_dbgfs(void)
>>
>> static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup(void)
>> {
>>- pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs();
>>- pnv_pci_ioda_setup_seg();
>>- pnv_pci_ioda_setup_DMA();
>>+ struct pci_controller *hose, *tmp;
>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>
>> pnv_pci_ioda_create_dbgfs();
>>
>>@@ -3039,6 +2977,12 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup(void)
>> eeh_init();
>> eeh_addr_cache_build();
>> #endif
>>+
>>+ /* Notify initialization of PHB done */
>>+ list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
>>+ phb = hose->private_data;
>>+ phb->initialized = 1;
>>+ }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>>@@ -3082,6 +3026,105 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> return phb->ioda.io_segsize;
>> }
>>
>>+/*
>>+ * We are updating root port or the upstream bridge behind the
>>+ * root port with PHB's windows in order to accommodate the
>>+ * changes on required resources during PCI (slot) hotplug,
>>+ * which is connected to either root port or the downstream
>>+ * ports of PCIe switch behind the root port.
>>+ */
>>+static void pnv_pci_fixup_bridge_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>+ unsigned long type)
>>+{
>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>+ struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
>>+ struct resource *r, *w;
>>+ int i;
>>+
>>+ /* Check if we need apply fixup to the bridge's windows */
>>+ if (!pci_is_root_bus(bridge->bus) &&
>>+ !pci_is_root_bus(bridge->bus->self->bus))
>>+ return;
>>+
>>+ /* Fixup the resoureces */
>>+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_NUM; i++) {
>>+ r = &bridge->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES + i];
>>+ if (!r->flags || !r->parent)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ w = NULL;
>>+ if (r->flags & type & IORESOURCE_IO)
>>+ w = &hose->io_resource;
>>+ else if (pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(r->flags) &&
>>+ (type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) &&
>>+ phb->ioda.m64_segsize)
>>+ w = &hose->mem_resources[1];
>>+ else if (r->flags & type & IORESOURCE_MEM)
>>+ w = &hose->mem_resources[0];
>>+
>>+ r->start = w->start;
>>+ r->end = w->end;
>>+ }
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void pnv_pci_setup_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>+ unsigned long type)
>>+{
>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>+ struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>+ bool all = (pci_pcie_type(bridge) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE);
>>+
>>+ /* The root bus (ancestor PE) should be finalized
>>+ * before anyone else
>>+ */
>>+ if (!phb->ioda.root_pe_is_populated) {
>>+ pe = pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(phb->hose->bus, false);
>>+ if (pe && phb->ioda.root_pe_idx == IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>+ phb->ioda.root_pe_idx = pe->pe_number;
>>+ phb->ioda.root_pe_is_populated = true;
>>+ }
>
>
>This "}" should be 1 tab left. Of you lost one "{" after if() and its
>counterpart.
>
Good catch!
>>+
>>+ /* Extend bridge's windows if necessary */
>>+ pnv_pci_fixup_bridge_resources(bus, type);
>>+
>>+ /* Don't assign PE to bus which doesn't have any
>>+ * subordinate PCI devices.
>>+ */
>>+ if (list_empty(&bus->devices))
>>+ return;
>>+
>>+ /* Reserve PEs for M64 resource */
>>+ if (phb->reserve_m64_pe)
>>+ phb->reserve_m64_pe(bus, NULL, all);
>>+
>>+ /* Assign PE. We might run here because of partial hotplug.
>>+ * For the case, we just pick up the existing PE and should
>>+ * not allocate resources again.
>>+ */
>>+ pe = pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(bus, all);
>>+ if (!pe)
>>+ return;
>>+
>>+ /* Setup MMIO mapping */
>>+ pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg(hose, pe);
>>+
>>+ /* Setup DMA */
>>+ switch (phb->type) {
>>+ case PNV_PHB_IODA1:
>>+ pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(phb, pe);
>>+ break;
>>+ case PNV_PHB_IODA2:
>>+ pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
>>+ break;
>>+ default:
>>+ pr_warn("%s: No DMA for PHB type %d\n",
>>+ __func__, phb->type);
>>+ }
>>+}
>>+
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> int resno)
>>@@ -3147,6 +3190,7 @@ static const struct pci_controller_ops pnv_pci_ioda_controller_ops = {
>> #endif
>> .enable_device_hook = pnv_pci_enable_device_hook,
>> .window_alignment = pnv_pci_window_alignment,
>>+ .setup_bridge = pnv_pci_setup_bridge,
>> .reset_secondary_bus = pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus,
>> .dma_set_mask = pnv_pci_ioda_dma_set_mask,
>> .shutdown = pnv_pci_ioda_shutdown,
>>@@ -3218,6 +3262,8 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct device_node *np,
>> if (phb->regs == NULL)
>> pr_err(" Failed to map registers !\n");
>>
>>+ pnv_pci_ioda_setup_opal_tce_kill(phb);
>>+
>> /* Initialize more IODA stuff */
>> phb->ioda.total_pe_num = 1;
>> prop32 = of_get_property(np, "ibm,opal-num-pes", NULL);
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>index e93a489..a160491 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ struct pnv_phb {
>> /* Global bridge info */
>> unsigned int total_pe_num;
>> unsigned int root_pe_idx;
>>+ bool root_pe_is_populated;
>> unsigned int reserved_pe_idx;
>>
>> /* 32-bit MMIO window */
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-15 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 4:11 [PATCH v6 00/42] powerpc/powernv: PCI hotplug suppport Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 01/42] PCI: Add pcibios_setup_bridge() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 02/42] powerpc/powernv: Drop pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 03/42] powerpc/powernv: Enable M64 on P7IOC Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 6:30 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10 23:45 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 2:06 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 10:28 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 04/42] powerpc/powernv: Reorder fields in struct pnv_phb Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 05/42] powerpc/powernv: Track IO/M32/M64 segments from PE Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 7:16 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:03 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 2:23 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-12 11:05 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 11:20 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-12 12:57 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 23:34 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 06/42] powerpc/powernv: Simplify pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 07/42] powerpc/powernv: Improve IO and M32 mapping Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 7:40 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:12 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 2:32 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 23:42 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 08/42] powerpc/powernv: Calculate PHB's DMA weight dynamically Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 7:48 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10 9:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 23:57 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 09/42] powerpc/powernv: DMA32 cleanup Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 8:07 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:19 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 10/42] powerpc/powernv: pnv_ioda_setup_dma() configure one PE only Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 9:31 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:29 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 2:39 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-12 23:59 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 11/42] powerpc/powernv: Trace DMA32 segments consumed by PE Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 9:43 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:33 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-13 0:02 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 12/42] powerpc/powernv: Increase PE# capacity Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 9:53 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:38 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 2:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-13 0:23 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 13/42] powerpc/pci: Cleanup on pci_controller_ops Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 14/42] powerpc/pci: Override pcibios_setup_bridge() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 15/42] powerpc/powernv: PE oriented during configuration Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 10:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:39 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 16/42] powerpc/powernv: Helper function pnv_ioda_init_pe() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 17/42] powerpc/powernv: Rename PE# fields in PHB Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 14:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:40 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 18/42] powerpc/powernv: Allocate PE# in deasending order Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 14:39 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-11 0:43 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 2:50 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-13 0:28 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 19/42] powerpc/powernv: Reserve PE# for root bus Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 20/42] powerpc/powernv: Create PEs dynamically Gavin Shan
2015-08-14 13:52 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-15 4:59 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2015-08-15 9:23 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 21/42] powerpc/powernv: Remove DMA32 list of PEs Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 22/42] powerpc/powernv: Move functions around Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 23/42] powerpc/powernv: Release PEs dynamically Gavin Shan
2015-08-11 13:03 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-13 0:54 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 24/42] powerpc/powernv: Supports slot ID Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 25/42] powerpc/powernv: Use PCI slot reset infrastructure Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 26/42] powerpc/powernv: Simplify pnv_eeh_reset() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 27/42] powerpc/powernv: Don't cover root bus in pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 28/42] powerpc/powernv: Fundamental reset " Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 29/42] powerpc/pci: Don't scan empty slot Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 30/42] powerpc/pci: Move pcibios_find_pci_bus() around Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 31/42] powerpc/pci: Rename pcibios_{add,remove}_pci_devices Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 32/42] powerpc/powernv: Introduce pnv_pci_poll() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 33/42] powerpc/powernv: Functions to get/reset PCI slot status Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 34/42] powerpc/pci: Delay creating pci_dn Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 35/42] powerpc/pci: Export traverse_pci_device_nodes() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 36/42] powerpc/pci: Update bridge windows on PCI plugging Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 37/42] powerpc/powernv: Select OF_DYNAMIC Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 38/42] drivers/of: Unflatten subordinate nodes after specified level Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 14:09 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-03 23:16 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 39/42] drivers/of: Allow to specify root node in of_fdt_unflatten_tree() Gavin Shan
2015-08-10 22:42 ` Frank Rowand
2015-08-11 0:52 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 40/42] drivers/of: Return allocated memory chunk from of_fdt_unflatten_tree() Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 14:19 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-10 22:42 ` Frank Rowand
2015-08-11 0:52 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 41/42] drivers/of: Export OF changeset functions Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 13:48 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-07 1:43 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 4:11 ` [PATCH v6 42/42] pci/hotplug: PowerPC PowerNV PCI hotplug driver Gavin Shan
2015-08-15 3:13 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-15 4:47 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-15 9:15 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10 6:05 ` [PATCH v6 00/42] powerpc/powernv: PCI hotplug suppport Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10 7:17 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150815045948.GA27636@gwshan \
--to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=panto@antoniou-consulting.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).