From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp01.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.1]:36784 "EHLO e28smtp01.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744AbbIIGBy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2015 02:01:54 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp01.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:31:51 +0530 Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCB2394005C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:31:47 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t8961XtJ8323276 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:31:33 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t8961V0l030674 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:31:32 +0530 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:01:29 +0800 From: Richard Yang To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Richard Yang , Gavin Shan , bhelgaas@google.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs Message-ID: <20150909060129.GC7684@Richards-MacBook-Pro.local> Reply-To: Richard Yang References: <1437112961-17275-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1437112961-17275-12-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150729031718.GA18069@richard> <20150909024820.GA6808@gwshan> <20150909033616.GA5148@richards-mbp.cn.ibm.com> <55EFC200.10209@ozlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <55EFC200.10209@ozlabs.ru> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:22:08PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 09/09/2015 01:36 PM, Richard Yang wrote: >>On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >>>>Hi, Michael >>>> >>>>Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little. >>>> >>> >>>[Cc Alexey who might concern the SRIOV status] >>> >>>Richard, do you have plan to get it upstream? It seems it's hanged >>>over here for long time. >>> >> >>The VF EEH is hung since we re-designed the SRIOV. After the re-design, we >>don't have VF groups. >> >>My plan is to push the VF EEH patch set after the SRIOV Redesign is accepted. > > >Can you please rebase on v4.2 (or v4.2 + sriov rework) and repost VF EEH >patchset just to me? Or share the tree somewhere where I can pull it from? >Thanks. > Yep, this is what I am planning to do. >As for now, I cannot tell what difference your SRIOV patchset actually makes. > >-- >Alexey -- Richard Yang Help you, Help me