From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.d.rustad@intel.com, myron.stowe@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Fix devfn for VPD access through function 0
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:17:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150915171216.7049.58119.stgit@gimli.home> (raw)
Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
guaranteed that a PCIe device is at slot address 0, but for the
general case, including conventional PCI, it's incorrect. We need
to get the slot and then convert it back into a devfn.
Fixes: 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function 0")
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
Since the original patch and quirk was marked for stable and applies
to all Intel NICs, regardless of the bus type, I assume this needs to
chase it or VPD might disappear on e1000/e100 if it currently exists.
drivers/pci/access.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index 769f7e3..5a5f0a7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_pci22_ops = {
static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
void *arg)
{
- struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+ struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+ PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
ssize_t ret;
if (!tdev)
@@ -456,7 +457,8 @@ static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
const void *arg)
{
- struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+ struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+ PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
ssize_t ret;
if (!tdev)
@@ -475,7 +477,8 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_f0_ops = {
static int pci_vpd_f0_dev_check(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
- struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+ struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+ PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
int ret = 0;
if (!tdev)
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 17:17 Alex Williamson [this message]
2015-09-23 17:19 ` [PATCH] PCI: Fix devfn for VPD access through function 0 Myron Stowe
2015-09-23 19:11 ` Rustad, Mark D
2015-09-24 18:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-24 18:35 ` Rustad, Mark D
2015-09-24 19:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150915171216.7049.58119.stgit@gimli.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.d.rustad@intel.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).