From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:34874 "EHLO mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755924AbbIYMvq (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:51:46 -0400 Received: by obbzf10 with SMTP id zf10so81002427obb.2 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:51:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:51:43 -0500 To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Jason Cooper , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mvebu PCI fixes and cleanups Message-ID: <20150925125143.GA25688@localhost> References: <20150923171706.GL21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150925093858.0af99c28@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150925093858.0af99c28@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 09:38:58AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Russell, > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:17:07 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > This small series contains a number of fixes and cleanups to the > > mvebu PCI host code. > > I've tested this series on my Armada XP GP board, with 3 PCIe cards > connected (one Intel e1000e NIC, one generic AHCI SATA card, and one > Marvell SATA card), and I saw no obvious regressions. The PCIe devices > are still properly enumerated, and they seem to work fine. There is no > change in the 'lspci -vv' output. > > Moreover, I've reviewed the different patches, and they look alright to > me. > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni > Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > Bjorn, will you propagate the Tested-by/Reviewed-by to all patches on > the series, or since I believe you're using patchwork, you want us to > post Tested-by/Reviewed-by replies to each patch? I'll propagate them, thanks. I use patchwork, but really only as a to-do list. I actually apply patches from mutt and tweak them using stgit. Bjorn