From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:10:37 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Ley Foon Tan , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Russell King , Dinh Nguyen , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , "Kumar Gala" , Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] Documentation: dt-bindings: pci: altera pcie device tree binding Message-ID: <20151003141037.140fcbc3@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <6497772.rqSurELzER@wuerfel> References: <1442801587-3812-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <6497772.rqSurELzER@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 23:56:37 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 02 October 2015 15:53:44 Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > Strictly speaking, if you have undocumented bindings downstream that > > > is your problem and we don't have to accept them as-is upstream. I'm > > > not going to worry about that here. > > > > > >>> txs contains the config space? > > >> It is not the config space, but a memory slave port. > > > > > > Then where is the config space? It should not be part of "ranges" is > > > all I care about. > > The config space is not part of "ranges". Our IP uses TLP packet to > > access config space. > > > > It took me a bit to figure out what you mean here. To save others > from reading the source, here is what I found: > > * The config space is accessed indirectly through registers from the > "cra" register range, which is the right approach according to the > point that Rob made. > * hardware-wise this basically looks like bit-banged PCIe, which is > both awesome and scary ;-) drivers/pcie/host/pcie-host-gpio.c anyone? ;-) M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.