From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Further mvebu PCIe patches
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:27:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151009162700.GA16112@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151003181228.GI21513@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 07:12:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Jason, Thomas,
>
> Here are further PCIe patches which follow on from the previous set of
> six I sent earlier in September. This set:
>
> * Separates the DT parsing from the use of this parsed data.
> * Fixes memory leaks from kasprintf() and refcount leaks of the DT
> node where we break out from the loop early.
> * Uses gpio_set_value_cansleep() so that GPIOs on I2C expanders can
> be used for the PCIe reset functionality.
> * Switch to using devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc(), which
> eliminates the multiplication, moving it into core code.
> * Switch to using a gpio descriptor for the reset gpio, which can
> contain the active level information from DT. (It would be nice
> if gpiolib automated some of the resource claiming there.)
> * Make PERST# vs clock timing to match PCIe specifications. PCIe
> specs require the clock to be running for 100us prior to releasing
> reset.
> * Add the standard PCIe capability block in root port form to the
> emulated PCIe configuration block. This allows the PCI layer to
> identify the "host bridge" as a PCIe device, and allows us to
> take advantage of the code in drivers/pci/pcie, particularly
> aspm for link power management.
> * As a result of identifying ourselves as a PCIe root port, this
> eliminates the need to special case accesses to non-slot 0 in
> the driver; the lack of other "slots" is something which the
> generic PCI code knows about for PCIe root ports.
>
> drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 404 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 305 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
Applied to pci/host-mvebu for v4.4 with Tested-by from Willy, Andrew,
and Thomas, and Reviewed-by from Thomas. I adjusted subject line
capitalization to match the history. Thanks, Russell and reviewers
and testers!
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-03 18:12 [PATCH 0/9] Further mvebu PCIe patches Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-03 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] pci: mvebu: move port parsing and resource claiming to separate function Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] pci: mvebu: fix memory leaks and refcount leaks Russell King
2015-10-09 14:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-09 15:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-10-09 15:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-09 15:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-09 16:39 ` Julia Lawall
2015-10-09 16:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-09 15:54 ` Julia Lawall
2015-10-09 15:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] pci: mvebu: split port parsing and resource claiming from port setup Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] pci: mvebu: use gpio_set_value_cansleep() Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] pci: mvebu: use devm_kcalloc() to allocate an array Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] pci: mvebu: use gpio_desc to carry around gpio Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] pci: mvebu: better implementation of clock/reset handling Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] pci: mvebu: add PCI Express root complex capability block Russell King
2015-10-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] pci: mvebu: remove code restricting accesses to slot 0 Russell King
2015-10-03 19:00 ` [PATCH 0/9] Further mvebu PCIe patches Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-05 21:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-10-08 23:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-10-09 15:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-09 16:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151009162700.GA16112@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).