From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, pratyush.anand@gmail.com,
m-karicheri2@ti.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de,
Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: designware: Use common LTSSM_STATE_MASK definition
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:15:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027151542.GF8660@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151021184250.28724.41928.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[+cc Minghuan]
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:42:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
>
> Add a common #define for LTSSM_STATE_MASK and use it in all the
> DesignWare-based drivers.
>
> Note that this changes LTSSM_STATE_MASK from 6 bits (0x3f) to 5 bits (0x1f)
> for i.MX6 and Layerscape. We believe this is safe for all DesignWare-based
> PCIe cores.
OK, DesignWare experts, what's the story on this LTSSM_STATE_MASK?
Minghuan says Layerscape requires a mask of 0x3f and it actually uses
states 0x20, 0x21, 0x22, and 0x23:
MH> Our LTSSM mask is 0x3f because it includes the following states:
MH> 0x20 S_RCVRY_EQ0
MH> 0x21 S_RCVRY_EQ1
MH> 0x22 S_RCVRY_EQ2
MH> 0x23 S_RCVRY_EQ3
MH> And I checked DesignWare Cores PCI Express Controller Databook
MH> v4.21a and found the following descriptor:
MH> [5:0]: smlh_ltssm_state: LTSSM current state. Encoding is defined in workspace/src/include/cxpl_defs.vh
MH> So could we use the mask 0x3f for all SoCs?
I couldn't find the "DesignWare Cores PCI Express Controller Databook
v4.21a", but I do see the Keystone mask (sec 3.9.11 of
http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugs6d/sprugs6d.pdf) is definitely only 5
bits, but that's clearly a TI register, not a generic DesignWare
register.
So it looks like a mistake to make a common LTSSM_STATE_MASK
definition. It looks like this is something with some variation and
we shouldn't make assumptions about it being common.
Now I'm concerned that the LTSSM state definitions I put in
drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h might not actually apply to
everything derived from DW. For example, the Layerscape S_RCVRY
states appear to be Layerscape-specific.
I don't want to put misleading stuff in
drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h if it's not really generic. Better
to have it in the individual drivers, with a prefix that indicates
that it applies to that driver, e.g., KS_LTSSM_MASK, LS_LTSSM_MASK,
etc.
Bjorn
> [bhelgaas: changelog, move removal of unused SPEAr13xx #defines to separate
> patch, add only LTSSM_STATE_MASK and change all users for reviewability]
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 3 +--
> drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone-dw.c | 1 -
> drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c | 1 -
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> index 6f43086..7b0d120 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> #define PCIE_PL_PFLR_LINK_STATE_MASK (0x3f << 16)
> #define PCIE_PL_PFLR_FORCE_LINK (1 << 15)
> #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R0 (PL_OFFSET + 0x28)
> -#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R0_LTSSM_MASK (0x3f << 0)
> #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1 (PL_OFFSET + 0x2c)
> #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_IN_TRAINING (1 << 29)
> #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP (1 << 4)
> @@ -508,7 +507,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp)
> if (rx_valid & PCIE_PHY_RX_ASIC_OUT_VALID)
> return 0;
>
> - if ((debug_r0 & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R0_LTSSM_MASK) != 0x0d)
> + if ((debug_r0 & LTSSM_STATE_MASK) != 0x0d)
> return 0;
>
> dev_err(pp->dev, "transition to gen2 is stuck, reset PHY!\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone-dw.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone-dw.c
> index e71da99..95a8b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone-dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone-dw.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>
> /* Application register defines */
> #define LTSSM_EN_VAL 1
> -#define LTSSM_STATE_MASK 0x1f
> #define LTSSM_STATE_L0 0x11
> #define DBI_CS2_EN_VAL 0x20
> #define OB_XLAT_EN_VAL 2
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> index b2328ea1..f02752e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
> /* PEX1/2 Misc Ports Status Register */
> #define SCFG_PEXMSCPORTSR(pex_idx) (0x94 + (pex_idx) * 4)
> #define LTSSM_STATE_SHIFT 20
> -#define LTSSM_STATE_MASK 0x3f
> #define LTSSM_PCIE_L0 0x11 /* L0 state */
>
> /* Symbol Timer Register and Filter Mask Register 1 */
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> index d0bbd27..a1a76ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #define MAX_MSI_IRQS 32
> #define MAX_MSI_CTRLS (MAX_MSI_IRQS / 32)
>
> +#define LTSSM_STATE_MASK 0x1f
> +
> struct pcie_port {
> struct device *dev;
> u8 root_bus_nr;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 18:42 [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: designware: LTSSM #define cleanup Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: designware: Use common LTSSM_STATE_MASK definition Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-22 14:51 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-27 15:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-10-27 16:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-10-27 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-27 23:34 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-10-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: designware: Use common LTSSM_STATE_RCVRY_LOCK definition Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-21 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: designware: Use common LTSSM_STATE_L0 definition Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-22 14:53 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-10-21 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: spear: Remove unused #defines Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-21 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: designware: LTSSM #define cleanup Fabio Estevam
2015-10-22 9:04 ` Lucas Stach
2015-10-22 15:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-23 6:53 ` Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027151542.GF8660@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).