From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:34618 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754069AbbKBVgM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:36:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:36:08 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Li Yang Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , Hu Mingkai-B21284 , Zang Roy-R61911 , Yoder Stuart-B08248 , Minghuan Lian , Zhou Wang , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] PCI: layerscape: add PCIe support for LS1043a and LS2080a Message-ID: <20151102213608.GA28371@localhost> References: <1444979960-24100-1-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> <1444979960-24100-5-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> <20151021213612.GK1583@localhost> <20151022180813.GA25693@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 03:08:04PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Hi Leo, > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Li Yang wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0800, Minghuan Lian wrote: > >> >> Both LS1043a and LS2080a are based on ARMv8 64-bit architecture > >> >> and have similar PCIe implementation. LUT is added to controller. > >> >> The patch removes the necessary fields from struct ls_pcie. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian > >> >> --- > >> >> This patch is based on v4.3-rc4 and [PATCH v10 3/6] > >> >> PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support. > >> > >> Hi Bjorn, > >> > >> Are you also applying this patch > >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/531184/ in this merge windows? > >> Because the new hardware can only work with the generic ARM64 support > >> added in the designware pcie driver. > > > > I'm reviewing that patch right now, and I do hope to apply it for > > v4.4. > > > > There was no cover letter for this series (Minghuan's Layerscape v4 > > series), and I didn't see any mention of dependencies, so I applied it > > on top of v4.3-rc1. Is that the wrong thing to do? If it depends on > > the Zhou's v11 series, I can hold the Layerscape branch until after > > that. > > I noticed that you have merged Zhou's latest patch. Probably you can > also merge the Layerscape branch now. That's my intention. Bjorn