From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override - part 2
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:49:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124184957.GB27957@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447095627-12798-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:00:27PM +0100, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Commit 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node
> override") missed that the user provided node could also be negative.
> Handle this case as well to avoid out-of-bounds accesses to the
> node_states[] array. However, allow the special value -1, i.e.
> NUMA_NO_NODE, to be able to set the 'no specific node' configuration.
>
> Fixes: 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node...")
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
Applied as tweaked below to for-linus for v4.4, thanks! As written,
if NUMA_NO_NODE were defined as -2, we would incorrectly accept -1.
Let me know if you disagree with my fix.
> ---
> v2: allow NUMA_NO_NODE
>
> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 92618686604c..6e9818227b19 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,10 @@ static ssize_t numa_node_store(struct device *dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node))
> + if (node < NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
commit 2a35194c5a45fbb9ca1d88bc56804dfb51a75233
Author: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon Nov 9 20:00:27 2015 +0100
PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override
Commit 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node
override") missed that the user-provided node could also be negative.
Handle this case as well to avoid out-of-bounds accesses to the
node_states[] array. However, allow the special value -1, i.e.
NUMA_NO_NODE, to be able to set the 'no specific node' configuration.
[bhelgaas: remove assumption that NUMA_NO_NODE == -1]
Fixes: 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override")
Fixes: 63692df103e9 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
CC: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index 9261868..50f4747 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -216,7 +216,12 @@ static ssize_t numa_node_store(struct device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node))
+ if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
return -EINVAL;
add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 19:00 [PATCH v2] PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override - part 2 Mathias Krause
2015-11-24 18:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-11-24 19:27 ` Mathias Krause
2015-11-24 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151124184957.GB27957@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).