From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: MSI: Only use the generic MSI layer when domain is hierarchical
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:46:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151204174621.GA20125@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5661C863.3070308@arm.com>
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:07:47PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 04/12/15 16:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:13:50AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:27:59 -0600
> >> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:25:34AM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> >>>> Cc'd linux-pci ml
> >>>>
> >>>> On 23 November 2015 14:27, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Since d8a1cb757550 ("PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct
> >>>> device::msi_domain"), we use the MSI domain associated to the PCI device.
> >>>>
> >>>> But finding a MSI domain doesn't mean that the domain is implemented
> >>>> using the generic MSI domain API, and a number of MSI controllers
> >>>> are still using the arch_setup_msi_irq/arch_teardown_msi_irqs.
> >>>>
> >>>> In order to avoid a firework on these systems, check that the domain
> >>>> we just obtained is hierarchical. If not, don't use the generic MSI
> >>>> stuff and stick with the old one. Not pretty, but reliable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Another insentive to rework those drivers and phase out this API.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reported-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> >>>> Tested-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, I applied this with Thomas' ack to pci/msi for v4.5.
> >>>
> >>> It looks like d8a1cb757550 appeared in v4.3. Is this a fix for that
> >>> commit? Does this need to be backported via a stable tag?
> >>
> >> Hi Bjorn,
> >>
> >> I think this really deserves to be queued as an immediate fix for 4.4
> >> rather than 4.5, as some systems in mainline are affected by this bug:
> >>
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg465792.html
> >>
> >> It would also deserve a stable tag for 4.3.
> >
> > OK, I can do that. It would save me a lot of time to get a hint when
> > this is the case. I couldn't tell if this issue happened on mainline
> > or with some still out-of-tree patches. I'd also like to know what
> > machines are affected.
>
> Sorry, I should have been more clear. At the moment, I've had reports of
> at least RCar, Tegra and Armada 370 being affected. Anything using the
> Designware driver will probably also fall over.
>
> > I did look at d8a1cb757550, and the connection between that and this
> > patch is not completely obvious; would you regard this as a fix to
> > d8a1cb757550? Should this patch be backported to every kernel that
> > includes d8a1cb757550? Or is this more closely tied to some other
> > change?
>
> d8a1cb757550 is indeed the source of the problem: we assumes that
> finding a domain identified by a given device is enough to decide that
> we're using the generic MSI layer. Unfortunately, this is not the case,
> and a number of ARM drivers are actually registering their own domain
> the same way, without using the generic MSI layer. I didn't spot this on
> arm64, as all my platforms are using this layer.
>
> So it seems better to merge this in 4.4, with a backport to 4.3 (which
> is the first kernel to contain this commit).
Thanks, Marc! I moved this to for-linus for v4.4, added info about
the machines, and added a stable tag for v4.3.
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-04 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1448288826-19058-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2015-11-30 10:25 ` [PATCH] PCI: MSI: Only use the generic MSI layer when domain is hierarchical Phil Edworthy
2015-12-04 0:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-04 8:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 16:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-04 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151204174621.GA20125@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).