From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:22122 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759955AbcAKUtN (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:49:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:49:11 +0000 From: Keith Busch To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jiang Liu , Thomas Gleixner , Dan Williams , Bjorn Helgaas , Bryan Veal , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Martin Mares , Jon Derrick Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/6] Driver for new "VMD" device Message-ID: <20160111204911.GB8743@localhost.localdomain> References: <1450719900-2824-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com> <20160111170617.GA30780@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160111170617.GA30780@localhost> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bjorn, Thanks for the catches. Most were simple fixes, and I used your cleanup suggestions for others. Will resend shortly. On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:06:17AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Checkpatch complained about a few things that should be easy to fix up: > > x86-pci-allow-pci-domain > -:26: WARNING: struct dma_map_ops should normally be const > x86-pci-initial-commit-for-new > -:125: WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? Question on the maintenance: does this new driver file need a maintainer, or does it fall under arch/x86/pci/ umbrella? I'm happy to supply updates and/or fixes once this is merged, but I just want to understand who to direct patches/pull requests to if the need arises.