From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@wantstofly.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: kernel: pci: remove pci=firmware command line parameter handling
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:51:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301095108.GB31766@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160229225653.GE3653@localhost>
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:56:53PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:43:20PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > According to kernel documentation, the pci=firmware command line
> > parameter is only meant to be used on IXP2000 ARM platforms to prevent
> > the kernel from assigning PCI resources configured by the bootloader.
> >
> > Since the IXP2000 ARM platforms support has been removed from the
> > kernel in commit:
> >
> > commit c65f2abf54a6 ("ARM: remove ixp23xx and ixp2000 platforms")
> >
> > its platforms specific kernel parameters should be removed
> > too from the kernel documentation along with the kernel code
> > currently handling them in that they have just become obsolete.
> >
> > This patch removes the pci=firmware command line parameter handling
> > from ARM code and the related kernel parameters documentation
> > section.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Thank you !
> It looks like Rob merged c65f2abf54a6, so maybe he will merge this as
> well? Otherwise I'd be happy to merge it; just let me know if you
> want me to.
Hopefully the kernel parameter description matches current usage
on ARM systems, it could affect all ARM 32-bit platforms (if any ?) that
abused the pci=firmware parameter, it is just impossible for me to check
(that's why I posted it as an RFC. It would be very good to remove that
kernel parameter though).
Having said that, either way of merging it is fine by me, I can send it
to Russell's patch system too, given that there are already patches queued
to remove PCI_PROBE_ONLY from some PCI host controllers I am happy for it
to go via PCI tree.
Rob, Russell, any preferences ?
Thanks !
Lorenzo
>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@wantstofly.org>
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 -----
> > arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 3 ---
> > 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 9a53c92..e213acc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -2875,11 +2875,6 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> > for broken drivers that don't call it.
> > skip_isa_align [X86] do not align io start addr, so can
> > handle more pci cards
> > - firmware [ARM] Do not re-enumerate the bus but instead
> > - just use the configuration from the
> > - bootloader. This is currently used on
> > - IXP2000 systems where the bus has to be
> > - configured a certain way for adjunct CPUs.
> > noearly [X86] Don't do any early type 1 scanning.
> > This might help on some broken boards which
> > machine check when some devices' config space
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > index 066f7f9..05e61a2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > @@ -550,9 +550,6 @@ char * __init pcibios_setup(char *str)
> > if (!strcmp(str, "debug")) {
> > debug_pci = 1;
> > return NULL;
> > - } else if (!strcmp(str, "firmware")) {
> > - pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> > - return NULL;
> > }
> > return str;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.5.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 17:43 [RFC PATCH] arm: kernel: pci: remove pci=firmware command line parameter handling Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-29 17:42 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2016-03-01 9:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-02 22:31 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2016-03-03 10:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-03 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-29 22:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-01 9:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160301095108.GB31766@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).