From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair
<jayachandran.chandrashekaran@broadcom.com>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
okaya@codeaurora.org, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 17/23] acpi, mcfg: Add default PCI config accessors implementation and initial support for related quirks.
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:42:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302104244.GA25547@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKc_7PWD_jcj323q9moSd4urc7FD1gr9KLqBL+Ox60Mv+zsrmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:33:41PM +0530, Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> wrote:
> > We use generic accessors from access.c by default. However, we already
> > know platforms that need special handling while accessing to PCI config
> > space. These platforms will need different accessors set matched against
> > platform ID, domain, bus touple. Therefore we are going to add (in future)
> > DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP which will register platform specific custom
> > accessors. For now, we let pci_mcfg_get_ops to take acpi_pci_root structure
> > as an arguments and left some space for quirk matching algorithm.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> > Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
> > Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
> > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> > Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
> > Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/mcfg.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/mcfg.c
> > index dca4c4e..dfc2d14 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/mcfg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/mcfg.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,36 @@ int __weak raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
> > return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > }
> >
> > +void __iomem *
> > +pci_mcfg_dev_base(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int offset)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> > +
> > + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number);
>
> In the existing code, calls to pci_mmconfig_lookup() is done inside an
> rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock pair. Any reason that is not required here?
>
> Also, you can avoid having to do the lookup every time by saving a cfg pointer
> see http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/396921.html
Yes, this is much better (and sysdata usage is self-contained, it does
not trickle into other bits of the kernel - ie arch code), it should be
integrated in the final version of the patchset.
> > + if (cfg && cfg->virt)
> > + return cfg->virt +
> > + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus->number) | (devfn << 12)) +
> > + offset;
>
> PCI_MMCFG_OFFSET(bus->number, devfn) would be better
Ditto.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
>
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Default generic PCI config accessors */
> > +static struct pci_ops default_pci_mcfg_ops = {
> > + .map_bus = pci_mcfg_dev_base,
> > + .read = pci_generic_config_read,
> > + .write = pci_generic_config_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pci_ops *pci_mcfg_get_ops(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: Match against platform specific quirks and return
> > + * corresponding PCI config space accessor set.
> > + */
> > +
> > + return &default_pci_mcfg_ops;
> > +}
>
> Is it necessary to make these non-static, even in the next patch, the
> functions are only used from this file.
>
> > +
> > int __init acpi_parse_mcfg(struct acpi_table_header *header)
> > {
> > struct acpi_table_mcfg *mcfg;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> > index 65b91f3..c974586 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> > @@ -83,10 +83,18 @@ void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
> > int pci_mmcfg_setup_map(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci);
> > void pci_mmcfg_teardown_map(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci);
> > +struct pci_ops *pci_mcfg_get_ops(struct acpi_pci_root *root);
> > +void __iomem *
> > +pci_mcfg_dev_base(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int offset);
> > #else
> > static inline int pci_mmcfg_setup_map(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> > { return 0; }
> > static inline void pci_mmcfg_teardown_map(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) { }
> > +static inline struct pci_ops *pci_mcfg_get_ops(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> > +{ return NULL; }
> > +static inline void __iomem *
> > +pci_mcfg_dev_base(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int offset)
> > +{ return NULL; }
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT
>
> JC.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-04 17:28 [PATCH V4 00/23] MMCONFIG refactoring and support for ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 01/23] x86, pci: Reorder logic of pci_mmconfig_insert() function Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 02/23] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 03/23] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide generic implementation of MCFG code initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 04/23] x86, pci: mmconfig_{32,64}.c code refactoring - remove code duplication Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 05/23] x86, pci, ecam: mmconfig_64.c becomes default implementation for ECAM driver Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 06/23] XEN / PCI: Remove the dependence on arch x86 when PCI_MMCONFIG=y Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 07/23] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide default RAW ACPI PCI config space accessors Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 08/23] arm64, acpi: Use MCFG and empty PCI config space accessors from mcfg.c file Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 09/23] pci, acpi, ecam: Add flag to indicate whether ECAM region was hot added or not Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 10/23] x86, pci: Cleanup platform specific MCFG data by using ECAM hot_added flag Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 11/23] pci, acpi: Move ACPI host bridge device companion assignment to core code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-09 18:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-10 21:09 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 12/23] x86, ia64, pci: Remove ACPI companion device from platform specific data Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-09 17:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-10 21:21 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 13/23] pci, acpi: Provide generic way to assign bus domain number Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 14/23] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 15/23] acpi, mcfg: Implement two calls that might be used to inject/remove MCFG region Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-10 14:06 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-12 8:56 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 16/23] x86, acpi, pci: Use equivalent function from mcfg.c driver Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 17/23] acpi, mcfg: Add default PCI config accessors implementation and initial support for related quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-29 8:03 ` Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair
2016-03-02 10:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 18/23] pci, of: Move the PCI I/O space management to PCI core code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 19/23] drivers: pci: add generic code to claim bus resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 20/23] pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller init Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:28 ` [PATCH V4 21/23] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:29 ` [PATCH V4 22/23] arm64, pci, acpi: Assign legacy IRQs once device is enable Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-11 11:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-11 17:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-11 18:39 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-11 18:46 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-02-04 17:29 ` [PATCH V4 23/23] arm64, pci, acpi: Start using ACPI based PCI host bridge driver for ARM64 Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302104244.GA25547@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jayachandran.chandrashekaran@broadcom.com \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).