From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
cov@codeaurora.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, lenb@kernel.org, harish.k@hpe.com,
ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce static IRQ array size to 16
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:38:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426183831.GD27803@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460914617-8259-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 01:36:54PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Now that the supported number of PCI IRQs are no longer capped
> with 256, renaming the static array to support ISA IRQs only
> and removing the MAX_IRQS constant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index cc0ba16..12ea784 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -438,8 +438,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
> * enabled system.
> */
>
> -#define ACPI_MAX_IRQS 256
> -#define ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ 16
> +#define ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS 16
>
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE (16*16)
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING (16*16*16)
> @@ -447,7 +446,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED (16*16*16*16*16)
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS (16*16*16*16*16*16)
>
> -static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
> +static int acpi_isa_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS] = {
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS, /* IRQ0 timer */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS, /* IRQ1 keyboard */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS, /* IRQ2 cascade */
> @@ -500,8 +499,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> {
> int penalty = 0;
>
> - if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ)
> - penalty += acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
Nit: sometimes you use "irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS", other times you use
"irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)". Seems like they could be
consistent.
> - if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty))
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> + if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
> + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> }
>
> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> {
> - return irq >= 0 && (irq >= ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty) ||
> + return irq >= 0 && (irq >= ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty) ||
> acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 17:36 [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements Sinan Kaya
2016-04-17 17:36 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce static IRQ array size to 16 Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 18:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-04-17 17:36 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] acpi,pci,irq: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-17 17:36 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] acpi,pci,irq: remove SCI penalize function Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 18:36 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-26 19:00 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 20:33 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-02 17:44 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-02 17:58 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-03 16:17 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-03 17:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-04-27 0:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-27 0:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-05 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160426183831.GD27803@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=harish.k@hpe.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).