From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pci_ioremap_set_mem_type(), pci_remap_iospace()
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:33:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160428143332.GC12470@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427225827.GC17629@localhost>
[+cc linux-pci, manually inserted reply, sorry again]
Liviu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:58:27PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Looking at __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller() makes me
>> suspect that pci_remap_iospace() is not safe on arm.
> Hmm, not sure how you reached that conclusion. __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller()
> does call in the end ioremap_page_range() for ARMv7 || ARM_LPAE, which is
> what pci_remap_iospace() does as well. Beside the possibly different
> pgprot_t values, what would make it unsafe for arm?
The different pgprot_t is exactly what I'm worried about. The callers of
pci_ioremap_io() probably get the right thing (a pgprot tweaked to deal
with this Cortex problem), but other callers of ioremap_page_range(),
pci_remap_iospace() in particular, don't get that tweak:
pci_ioremap_io
ioremap_page_range(..., __pgprot(get_mem_type(pci_ioremap_mem_type)->prot_pte))
pci_remap_iospace
ioremap_page_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
ioremap_pud_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
ioremap_pmd_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
ioremap_pte_range(..., pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL))
set_pte_at(..., pfn_pte(pfn, pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160427225827.GC17629@localhost>
2016-04-28 14:19 ` pci_ioremap_set_mem_type(), pci_remap_iospace() Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-28 14:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-28 16:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-28 14:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-04-28 14:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160428143332.GC12470@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).