From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Relocate screen_info.lfb_base on PCI BAR allocation
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:20:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160428162035.GB19785@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461795744-28837-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:22:24AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> When booting with efifb, we get a frame buffer address passed into the system.
> This address can be backed by any device, including PCI devices.
I guess we get the frame buffer address via EFI, but it doesn't tell
us what PCI device it's connected to?
This same thing could happen on any EFI arch, I guess. Maybe even on
non-EFI arches, if there's a way to discover the frame buffer address
as a bare address rather than a "offset X into BAR Y of PCI device Z"
sort of thing.
> PCI devices can have their BARs mapped to various places inside the PCI window
> though. Linux makes use of that on early boot and usually maps PCI BARs wherever
> it thinks makes sense.
>
> If we now load the efifb driver after that BAR map has happened, the frame
> buffer address we received may be invalid, because it was in a BAR map before
> Linux modified it.
>
> To work around that issue, this patch introduces a BAR mapping callback that
> gets called every time Linux (re)allocates a BAR. That way our arm64 efi code
> can check whether the frame buffer is inside the old map and adjust it to
> the new one.
>
> With this and the efifb patches applied, I can successfully see efifb output
> even after Linux remapped BARs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> index 56a76b6..3612110 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/efi.h>
> @@ -213,6 +214,41 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
> set_bit(EFI_MEMMAP, &efi.flags);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> +static bool efi_pci_overlaps_efifb(struct pci_bar_update_info *update_info)
> +{
> + /* is the screen_info frame buffer inside the pci BAR? */
> + if (screen_info.lfb_base >= update_info->old_start &&
> + (screen_info.lfb_base + screen_info.lfb_size) <=
> + (update_info->old_start + update_info->size))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int efi_pci_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> + unsigned long cmd, void *v)
> +{
> + struct pci_bar_update_info *update_info = v;
> +
> + /*
> + * When we reallocate a BAR that contains our frame buffer, set the
> + * screen_info base to where it belongs
> + */
> + if (efi_pci_overlaps_efifb(update_info)) {
> + u64 diff = (update_info->new_start - update_info->old_start);
> + screen_info.lfb_base += diff;
> + }
> +
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +static struct notifier_block efi_pci_notifier_block = {
> + .notifier_call = efi_pci_notifier,
> +};
> +#else
> +#define pci_notify_on_update_resource(a)
> +#endif
> +
> void __init efi_init_fdt(void *fdt)
> {
> struct efi_fdt_params params;
> @@ -246,8 +282,10 @@ void __init efi_init_fdt(void *fdt)
> reserve_regions();
> early_memunmap(memmap.map, params.mmap_size);
>
> - if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA == VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
> + if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA == VIDEO_TYPE_EFI) {
> + pci_notify_on_update_resource(&efi_pci_notifier_block);
> memblock_reserve(screen_info.lfb_base, screen_info.lfb_size);
> + }
> }
>
> static int __init register_gop_device(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> index 604011e..d5c24fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> @@ -23,8 +23,10 @@
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include "pci.h"
>
> +static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(bar_update_chain);
>
> void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
> {
> @@ -35,6 +37,9 @@ void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
> int reg;
> enum pci_bar_type type;
> struct resource *res = dev->resource + resno;
> + struct pci_bar_update_info update_info;
> + struct pci_bus_region update_reg;
> + struct resource update_res;
>
> if (dev->is_virtfn) {
> dev_warn(&dev->dev, "can't update VF BAR%d\n", resno);
> @@ -77,6 +82,22 @@ void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Fetch the old BAR location from the device, so we can notify
> + * users of that BAR that its location is changing.
> + */
> + pci_read_config_dword(dev, reg, &check);
> + update_reg.start = check & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> + if (check & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) {
> + pci_read_config_dword(dev, reg, &check);
> + update_reg.start |= ((u64)check) << 32;
> + }
> + update_info.size = region.end - region.start;
> + update_reg.end = update_reg.start + update_info.size;
> + pcibios_bus_to_resource(dev->bus, &update_res, &update_reg);
> + update_info.old_start = update_res.start;
> + update_info.new_start = res->start;
> +
> + /*
> * We can't update a 64-bit BAR atomically, so when possible,
> * disable decoding so that a half-updated BAR won't conflict
> * with another device.
> @@ -108,6 +129,14 @@ void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
>
> if (disable)
> pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> +
> + /* Tell interested parties that the BAR mapping changed */
> + raw_notifier_call_chain(&bar_update_chain, 0, &update_info);
> +}
> +
> +int pci_notify_on_update_resource(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> + return raw_notifier_chain_register(&bar_update_chain, nb);
> }
>
> int pci_claim_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resource)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index c061250..04a430e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/resource_ext.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/pci.h>
>
> #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> @@ -1037,6 +1038,13 @@ int pci_select_bars(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned long flags);
> bool pci_device_is_present(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> void pci_ignore_hotplug(struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> +struct pci_bar_update_info {
> + u64 old_start;
> + u64 new_start;
> + u64 size;
> +};
> +int pci_notify_on_update_resource(struct notifier_block *nb);
> +
> /* ROM control related routines */
> int pci_enable_rom(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> void pci_disable_rom(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> --
> 1.8.5.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 22:22 [PATCH] arm64: Relocate screen_info.lfb_base on PCI BAR allocation Alexander Graf
2016-04-28 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-04-28 16:41 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-28 18:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-28 21:39 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-29 10:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-04-29 13:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-29 13:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-04-29 20:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-29 20:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-04-29 20:51 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-29 21:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-29 21:52 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-29 22:03 ` Alexander Graf
2016-04-29 23:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-30 21:17 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-29 21:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160428162035.GB19785@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).