From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:60364 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702AbcEINfQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 09:35:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:35:12 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Yong, Jonathan" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Message-ID: <20160509133512.GA3580@localhost> References: <1461047358-4736-1-git-send-email-jonathan.yong@intel.com> <1461047358-4736-2-git-send-email-jonathan.yong@intel.com> <20160508023821.GA13531@localhost> <572FFFD8.30709@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <572FFFD8.30709@intel.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 11:11:20AM +0800, Yong, Jonathan wrote: > On 05/08/2016 10:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:29:18AM +0000, Yong, Jonathan wrote: > >>Simplified Precision Time Measurement driver, activates PTM feature > >>if a PCIe PTM requester (as per PCI Express 3.1 Base Specification > >>section 7.32)is found, but not before checking if the rest of the > >>PCI hierarchy can support it. > >> > >>The driver does not take part in facilitating PTM conversations, > >>neither does it provide any useful services, it is only responsible > >>for setting up the required configuration space bits. > >> > >>As of writing, there aren't any PTM capable devices on the market > >>yet, but it is supported by the Intel Apollo Lake platform. > > > >Can you also add lspci support for the PTM capability? That will help > >debugging. > > > >Bjorn > > > > Do I also send it to this list? Or directly to Martin? Send it to Martin and cc this list.