From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
helgaas@kernel.org, pjw@netapp.com, axboe@fb.com,
keith.busch@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:50:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160511085049.GA20279@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511074527.GA31347@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Hi Alexander,
> Moreover, patch 2/2 not only removed pci_enable_msi[x]_range()
> internal fallback logic (from desired number of interrupts to
> available number of interrupts), but it also removed MSI-X to
> MSI fallback.
That is done in the very begining of the function, see the quoted
part of the patch just below:
> > + if (dev->msix_cap && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX))
> > + nr_vecs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_vecs, pci_msix_vec_count(dev));
> > + else if (dev->msi_cap)
> > + nr_vecs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_vecs, pci_msi_vec_count(dev));
> > + else
> > + goto use_legacy_irq;
> > + if (dev->msix_cap && !(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX))
> > + ret = __pci_enable_msix(dev, nr_vecs);
> > + else
> > + ret = __pci_enable_msi(dev, nr_vecs);
>
> 1. No fallbacks.
I read through the code in msi.c in detail and could not find a legitimate
case where we have msix_cap but actually fail the MSI-X allocation. If that
is a valid case I can happily add the fallback here as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 14:04 PCI: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-06 16:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-06 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-06 16:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-08 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-09 22:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-11 8:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-16 19:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-17 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-11 7:45 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-11 8:50 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-05-11 9:44 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 9:44 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 12:11 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 12:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-13 8:29 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-11 1:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-13 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-21 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-12 11:04 ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-05-12 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: switch to use pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-10 15:27 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160511085049.GA20279@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjw@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).