From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new devices
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:35:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160530093511.GI1789@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9162683.GfsX7n9xoz@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:21:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:16:43 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:45:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 04:19:48 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:13:09AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:53:23PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > > > I dropped "ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Runtime resume bridge before rescan"
> > > > > > > on the assumption that "PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new
> > > > > > > devices" is sufficient to cover both the ACPI and the generic PCi
> > > > > > > rescan cases, but I'd like some reassurance about that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree with your reasoning that the patch should not be needed anymore.
> > > > > > However, I have the machine which needed that patch at home so I'm not
> > > > > > able to test it now. I'll do that later today when I get back home.
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried now on my Lenovo Yoga 900 laptop and unfortunately "PCI: Power
> > > > > on bridges before scanning new devices" seems not to be enough. This
> > > > > machine has SD-card reader connected to one PCIe port and once I unload
> > > > > the sdhci-pci driver and enable runtime PM for the device, next system
> > > > > suspend/resume cycle loses the SD-card reader PCI device.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will investigate more tomorrow -- it is getting late here.
> > > >
> > > > I think I found reason for the issue.
> > > >
> > > > When the laptop resumes it will send ACPI BUS_CHECK event for the two
> > > > PCIe root ports. This ends up in acpiphp_check_bridge() where it goes
> > > > through all slots in that bridge checking if the devices are still
> > > > present. This happens before we call pci_scan_bridge() for the bridge
> > > > itself.
> > > >
> > > > Since the bridge is in D3 config space of the device behind it is not
> > > > available and we determine that the device is not there anymore.
> > > >
> > > > It looks like we either need that ACPI hotplug patch or alternatively we
> > > > could add pm_runtime_get/put() in acpiphp_check_bridge().
> > >
> > > Have you tried the latter?
> >
> > Indeed I tried and it worked fine. I can make formal patch doing that
> > which then replaces the current ACPI hotplug patch, if that is the
> > preferred way.
>
> It is somewhat cleaner, so I'd prefer it.
Okay, I'm going to submit an updated version of that patch then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-30 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 17:14 Rescanning is broken with runtime PM for PCIe ports Peter Wu
2016-05-19 7:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-19 11:36 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-20 8:45 ` Peter Wu
2016-05-23 8:20 ` [PATCH] PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new devices Mika Westerberg
2016-05-23 20:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-23 21:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 12:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 12:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-24 12:53 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-24 14:27 ` Peter Wu
2016-05-24 15:06 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-24 16:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 23:46 ` Peter Wu
2016-05-24 16:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-25 15:04 ` [PATCH] PCI: Wait for 50ms after bridge is powered up Mika Westerberg
2016-05-25 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-26 10:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-26 10:25 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-26 10:45 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-26 11:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-28 12:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-30 9:33 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-30 14:44 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-30 15:19 ` Andreas Noever
2016-05-31 8:33 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-31 8:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-31 10:40 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-31 10:47 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-31 11:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-01 9:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-01 11:42 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-24 21:13 ` [PATCH] PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new devices Mika Westerberg
2016-05-25 0:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-25 13:19 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-25 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-26 8:16 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-28 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-30 9:35 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-05-25 12:16 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-05-25 13:25 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160530093511.GI1789@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).