From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:47699 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752116AbcFBMpp (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:45:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:45:42 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Lunn , Lior Amsalem , Yehuda Yitschak , Jason Cooper , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Hanna Hawa , Nadav Haklai , Gregory Clement , Bjorn Helgaas , Marcin Wojtas , Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: add DT binding for the Aardvark PCIe controller Message-ID: <20160602144542.6bc1b421@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <8313817.cgODJZVrao@wuerfel> References: <1464858585-10963-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1464858585-10963-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20160602122405.GG17343@lunn.ch> <8313817.cgODJZVrao@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:34:14 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I think some other PCI hosts just move the interrupt-controller > and #interrupt-cells properties into the PCI host node itself, > which avoids the ambiguity here. Do you have an example of this? I have modeled my DT binding after the one used by the pci-dra7xx driver, which is in the same situation as I am in terms of interrupt handling. But I can indeed try to make the top-level PCIe controller node the interrupt controller. Let me try that quickly. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com