From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Limiting pci access requests
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:05:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160817210539.GA25146@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160809185628.GA6729@wunner.de>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 08:56:28PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:56:54PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> > There are still more places that we can remove unnecessary config and
> > MMIO, though they're just micro-improvements compared to this series.
> > Even those just repeat the same pattern of looking for a -1 completion
> > or false return from "pci_device_is_present". So the "fixes" do look
> > tedious and piecemeal, but I didn't see how else we could do it. Any
> > thoughts or guidance is much appreciated.
>
> FWIW, similar checks were added to pciehp with commit 1469d17dd341
> ("PCI: pciehp: Handle invalid data when reading from non-existent
> devices"). So the general idea to handle such faults is already
> present in the kernel, the only improvement I could see here would
> be to harmonize (i.e. make identical everywhere) the way this is
> coded (check for ~0) as well as the message logged with KERN_INFO
> (your patches do not log a message at all AFAICS).
AFAICT, the only thing we can do is have every caller of
pci_read_config_*, pci_bus_read_config_*, and pcie_capability_read_*
check for ~0 completion, and handle accordingly. Is that what you mean
by making this identical everywhere? That is a lot of places to fix! :)
I could write a coccinelle pattern for that, but the actual handling
would need to be specific to where it's called, and it may accidently
treat a legit all 1's completion as an error.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 19:14 [PATCH 0/3] Limiting pci access requests Keith Busch
2016-08-08 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] pcie: Don't search capabilities on removed devices Keith Busch
2016-08-18 22:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-08 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] pci/msix: Skip disabling " Keith Busch
2016-08-18 23:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-19 17:11 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-08 19:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] pcie/aer: Cache capability position Keith Busch
2016-08-09 17:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-06 21:05 ` Jon Derrick
2016-09-06 21:18 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-09 17:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] Limiting pci access requests Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-09 18:56 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-09 18:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-08-17 21:05 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-08-18 14:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-08-18 16:05 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-18 16:59 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160817210539.GA25146@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=wzhang@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).