linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, helgaas@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: call pci_intx when using legacy interrupts in pci_alloc_irq_vectors
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:20:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160818092007.GD27949@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470924665-25860-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:11:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ahci currently insists on an explicit call to pci_intx before falling back
> from MSI or MSI-X to legacy irqs.  As pci_intx is a no-op if the command
> register already contains the right value is seems safe and useful to add
> this call to pci_alloc_irq_vectors so that ahci can just use
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors.

Looking at ahci_init_interrupts() (and probably at commit d684a90d
("ahci: per-port msix support")) it looks like pci_alloc_irq_vectors()
is able to preserve the current AHCI logic?

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/msi.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 9233e7f..593698e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -1200,8 +1200,11 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* use legacy irq if allowed */
> -	if ((flags & PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) && min_vecs == 1)
> +	if ((flags & PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) && min_vecs == 1) {
> +		pci_intx(dev, 1);

It would rather called pci_intx_for_msi() here. But because it is
a generic code I am not sure what implications it has for all
drivers out there.

>  		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	return vecs;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_irq_vectors);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-18  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-11 14:11 two pci_alloc_irq_vectors improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] pci: use positive flags in pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-18  8:46   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-08-11 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] pci: call pci_intx when using legacy interrupts " Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-18  9:20   ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2016-08-18 10:33     ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-08-18 15:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-22 11:02       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-08-14 15:14 ` two pci_alloc_irq_vectors improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-16 19:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-17  0:48   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160818092007.GD27949@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).