From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Prager <linux@matthiasprager.de>,
Jason Taylor <jason.taylor@simplivity.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 028/113] genirq/msi: Make sure PCI MSIs are activated early
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 18:43:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905164350.435027692@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160905164349.217621339@linuxfoundation.org>
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
commit f3b0946d629c8bfbd3e5f038e30cb9c711a35f10 upstream.
Bharat Kumar Gogada reported issues with the generic MSI code, where the
end-point ended up with garbage in its MSI configuration (both for the vector
and the message).
It turns out that the two MSI paths in the kernel are doing slightly different
things:
generic MSI: disable MSI -> allocate MSI -> enable MSI -> setup EP
PCI MSI: disable MSI -> allocate MSI -> setup EP -> enable MSI
And it turns out that end-points are allowed to latch the content of the MSI
configuration registers as soon as MSIs are enabled. In Bharat's case, the
end-point ends up using whatever was there already, which is not what you
want.
In order to make things converge, we introduce a new MSI domain flag
(MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY) that is unconditionally set for PCI/MSI. When set,
this flag forces the programming of the end-point as soon as the MSIs are
allocated.
A consequence of this is that we have an extra activate in irq_startup, but
that should be without much consequence.
tglx:
- Several people reported a VMWare regression with PCI/MSI-X passthrough. It
turns out that the patch also cures that issue.
- We need to have a look at the MSI disable interrupt path, where we write
the msg to all zeros without disabling MSI in the PCI device. Is that
correct?
Fixes: 52f518a3a7c2 "x86/MSI: Use hierarchical irqdomains to manage MSI interrupts"
Reported-and-tested-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Foster Snowhill <forst@forstwoof.ru>
Reported-by: Matthias Prager <linux@matthiasprager.de>
Reported-by: Jason Taylor <jason.taylor@simplivity.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468426713-31431-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 2 ++
include/linux/msi.h | 2 ++
kernel/irq/msi.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -1278,6 +1278,8 @@ struct irq_domain *pci_msi_create_irq_do
if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS)
pci_msi_domain_update_chip_ops(info);
+ info->flags |= MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY;
+
domain = msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, info, parent);
if (!domain)
return NULL;
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -258,6 +258,8 @@ enum {
MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI = (1 << 2),
/* Support PCI MSIX interrupts */
MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX = (1 << 3),
+ /* Needs early activate, required for PCI */
+ MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY = (1 << 4),
};
int msi_domain_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask,
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -303,6 +303,17 @@ int msi_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_dom
else
dev_dbg(dev, "irq [%d-%d] for MSI\n",
virq, virq + desc->nvec_used - 1);
+ /*
+ * This flag is set by the PCI layer as we need to activate
+ * the MSI entries before the PCI layer enables MSI in the
+ * card. Otherwise the card latches a random msi message.
+ */
+ if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY) {
+ struct irq_data *irq_data;
+
+ irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, desc->irq);
+ irq_domain_activate_irq(irq_data);
+ }
}
return 0;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-05 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160905164349.217621339@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-09-05 16:43 ` [PATCH 4.4 027/113] genirq/msi: Remove unused MSI_FLAG_IDENTITY_MAP Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-09-05 16:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160905164350.435027692@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jason.taylor@simplivity.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@matthiasprager.de \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).