From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Patel, Mayurkumar" <mayurkumar.patel@intel.com>
Cc: 'Rajat Jain' <rajatja@google.com>,
"'bhelgaas@google.com'" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"'linux-pci@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"'mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com'"
<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"Tarazona-Duarte,
Luis Antonio" <luis.antonio.tarazona-duarte@intel.com>,
'Rajat Jain' <rajatxjain@gmail.com>,
'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Fix presence detect change interrupt handling
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:59:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908195912.GB9440@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92EBB4272BF81E4089A7126EC1E7B28466598F18@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:58:51AM +0000, Patel, Mayurkumar wrote:
> Currently, if very fast hotplug removal and insertion event comes
> as following
>
> [ 608.823412] pciehp 0000:00:1c.1:pcie04: Card not present on Slot(1)
> [ 608.835249] pciehp 0000:00:1c.1:pcie04: Card present on Slot(1)
>
> In this case following scenario happens,
>
> While removal:
> pcie_isr() -> pciehp_queue_interrupt_event() -> triggers queue_work().
> work invokes interrupt_event_handler() -> case INT_PRESENCE_OFF
> and calls handle_surprise_event().
>
> handle_surprise_event() again calls pciehp_get_adapter_status()
> and reads slot status which might have been changed
> already due to PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC event for hotplug insertion
> has happened. So it queues, ENABLE_REQ for both removal
> and insertion interrupt based on latest slot status.
>
> In this case, PCIe device can not be hot-add again because
> it was never removed due to which device can not get enabled.
>
> handle_surprise_event() can be removed and pciehp_queue_power_work()
> can be directly triggered based on INT_PRESENCE_ON and INT_PRESENCE_OFF
> from the switch case exist in interrupt_event_hanlder().
>
> The patch ensures the pciehp_queue_power_work() processes
> presence detect change for removal and insertion correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mayurkumar Patel <mayurkumar.patel@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
I applied this to pci/hotplug for v4.9, with the following changelog.
PCI: pciehp: Fix presence detect change interrupt handling
When a hotplug insertion happens immediately after a hotplug removal, we
may not handle the removal correctly, which may cause the insertion to
fail.
If Presence Detect State (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS) has changed from "card
present" to "empty", we must remove the kernel pci_dev, even if a device
is inserted again. With the previous code, that might not happen if the
insertion happens soon after the removal. Consider this path:
# hotplug removal causes interrupt and clears PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS
pcie_isr
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &status)
present = status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS # FALSE
pciehp_queue_interrupt_event(INT_PRESENCE_OFF)
queue_work(...) # interrupt_event_handler
# hotplug insertion sets PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS
interrupt_event_handler
handle_surprise_event
pciehp_get_adapter_status
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &status)
present = status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS # TRUE <----
pciehp_queue_power_work(ENABLE_REQ)
The first PCI_EXP_SLTSTA read sees that the slot was empty, so we queue up
handle_surprise_event(). But handle_surprise_event() reads PCI_EXP_SLTSTA
again, and by that time, the slot has a card in it again, so it tries to
turn on the power and scan the slot. The scan fails because we still have
the old pci_dev for the device that was removed.
In interrupt_event_handler(), we already know the event type
(INT_PRESENCE_ON or INT_PRESENCE_OFF), so there's no need to read
PCI_EXP_SLTSTA again in handle_surprise_event(). Remove
handle_surprise_event() and queue the power work directly.
> ---
> Resending the patch with another patch which has pcie_isr() correct
> event handling proposal
>
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c | 18 ++----------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> index 880978b..87c5bea 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> @@ -301,20 +301,6 @@ static void handle_button_press_event(struct slot *p_slot)
> /*
> * Note: This function must be called with slot->lock held
> */
> -static void handle_surprise_event(struct slot *p_slot)
> -{
> - u8 getstatus;
> -
> - pciehp_get_adapter_status(p_slot, &getstatus);
> - if (!getstatus)
> - pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, DISABLE_REQ);
> - else
> - pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, ENABLE_REQ);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Note: This function must be called with slot->lock held
> - */
> static void handle_link_event(struct slot *p_slot, u32 event)
> {
> struct controller *ctrl = p_slot->ctrl;
> @@ -377,14 +363,14 @@ static void interrupt_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> pciehp_green_led_off(p_slot);
> break;
> case INT_PRESENCE_ON:
> - handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
> + pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, ENABLE_REQ);
> break;
> case INT_PRESENCE_OFF:
> /*
> * Regardless of surprise capability, we need to
> * definitely remove a card that has been pulled out!
> */
> - handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
> + pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, DISABLE_REQ);
> break;
> case INT_LINK_UP:
> case INT_LINK_DOWN:
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> Intel Deutschland GmbH
> Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
> Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
> Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
> Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
> Registered Office: Munich
> Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-23 8:58 [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Fix presence detect change interrupt handling Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-09-08 19:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-17 22:37 [PATCH v1] " Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-08-18 21:07 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] " Mayurkumar Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160908195912.GB9440@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.antonio.tarazona-duarte@intel.com \
--cc=mayurkumar.patel@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).