From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:24:41 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Hanjun Guo Cc: nwatters@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tomasz Nowicki , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Jon Masters , Eric Auger , Sinan Kaya , Prem Mallappa , Dennis Chen , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] drivers: acpi: iort: add support for ARM SMMU platform devices creation Message-ID: <20160913082441.GA28804@red-moon> References: <20160909142343.13314-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <20160909142343.13314-8-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <7a63cf312b6e9714cdce1d0aca88cf4d@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:15:31PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: [...] > >>+static acpi_status __init iort_match_iommu_callback(struct > >>acpi_iort_node *node, > >>+ void *context) > >>+{ > >>+ int ret; > >>+ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > >>+ > >>+ fwnode = iort_get_fwnode(node); > >>+ > >>+ if (!fwnode) > >>+ return AE_NOT_FOUND; > >>+ > >>+ ret = iort_add_smmu_platform_device(fwnode, node); > >>+ if (ret) { > >>+ pr_err("Error in platform device creation\n"); > >>+ return AE_ERROR; > >>+ } > >>+ > >>+ return AE_OK; > >>+} > >>+ > >>+static void __init iort_smmu_init(void) > >>+{ > >>+ iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU, iort_match_iommu_callback, > >>NULL); > >>+ iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3, iort_match_iommu_callback, > >>NULL); > > > >Since iort_scan_node() returns after the first successful match it finds, > >only the first SMMU_V3 in my IORT is being enumerated. I think you need > >to go back to the "iterator" like approach you had been using or make > >iort_match_iommu_callback() always return a non-AE_OK value so the scan > >continues and has a chance to visit all of the SMMU_V3 nodes. > > Please use the updated version of IORT patch (aka Tomasz's v11) > then things will work fine. Nate is right, I was too keen on using iort_scan_node(), it does not really work here (unless as he said I return a value !AE_OK in the callback, which is horrible), I reverted back to the iterator approach and I can push out a fixed up branch if useful before next posting. Thanks, Lorenzo