From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v14 09/17] sparc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge register number
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:01:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160916200207.21439-10-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160916200207.21439-1-yinghai@kernel.org>
On one system found strange "no compatible bridge window" warning
even we already had pref_compat support that add extra pref bit for device
resource.
PCI: Claiming 0000:00:01.0: Resource 14: 0002000100000000..000200010fffffff [10220c]
PCI: Claiming 0000:01:00.0: Resource 1: 0002000100000000..000200010000ffff [100214]
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 1 [mem 0x2000100000000-0x200010000ffff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
It turns out that pci_resource_compatible()/pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64()
just check resource with bridge pref mmio register idx 15, and we have put
resource to use mmio register idx 14 during of_scan_pci_bridge()
as the bridge does not have mmio resource.
We already fix pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64() to check all bus resources.
And at the same time, this patch make resource to have consistent sequence
like other arch or directly from pci_read_bridge_bases(),
even when non-pref mmio is missing, or out of ordering in firmware reporting.
Just hold i = 1 for non pref mmio, and i = 2 for pref mmio.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 654cf21..c6a3971 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
pci_read_bridge_bases(bus);
goto after_ranges;
}
- i = 1;
+ i = 3;
for (; len >= 32; len -= 32, ranges += 8) {
u64 start;
@@ -513,6 +513,12 @@ static void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
" for bridge %s\n", node->full_name);
continue;
}
+ } else if ((flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) &&
+ !bus->resource[2]->flags) {
+ res = bus->resource[2];
+ } else if (((flags & (IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)) ==
+ IORESOURCE_MEM) && !bus->resource[1]->flags) {
+ res = bus->resource[1];
} else {
if (i >= PCI_NUM_RESOURCES - PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) {
printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: too many memory ranges"
--
2.8.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-16 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-16 20:01 [PATCH v14 00/17] PCI: Fixup for 64bit resource with sparc Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 01/17] PCI: Fix proc mmap on sparc Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 02/17] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 03/17] PCI: Remove __pci_mmap_make_offset() Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 04/17] PCI: Check resource alignment for /sys pci_mmap_resource path Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 05/17] sparc/PCI: Use correct offset for bus address to resource Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 06/17] PCI: Add pci_find_bus_resource() Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 07/17] sparc/PCI: Reserve legacy mmio after PCI mmio Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v14 08/17] sparc/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource in OF parsing Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:01 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 10/17] powerpc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge register number Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 11/17] powerpc/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource in OF parsing Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 12/17] OF/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 13/17] PCI: Check pref compatible bit for mem64 resource of PCIe device Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 14/17] PCI: Only treat non-pref mmio64 as pref if all bridges have MEM_64 Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 15/17] PCI: Add has_mem64 for struct host_bridge Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 16/17] PCI: Only treat non-pref mmio64 as pref if host bridge has mmio64 Yinghai Lu
2016-09-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v14 17/17] PCI: Restore pref MMIO allocation logic for host bridge without mmio64 Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160916200207.21439-10-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).