From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pci: Add is_removed state
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:47:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160919174723.GA8000@keith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160917083506.GA1235@wunner.de>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:00:16PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > - return pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(pdev->bus, pdev->devfn, &v, 0);
> > + if (pdev->is_removed)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (!pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(pdev->bus, pdev->devfn, &v, 0)) {
> > + pdev->is_removed = 1;
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + return true;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_device_is_present);
>
> I've kept this series on my development branch and found a bug now:
>
> In the above hunk, it's okay to return false if pdev->is_removed is set,
> but it's not okay to set pdev->is_removed if pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id()
> returns false. That's because pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() can fail for
> other reasons, such as the device being powered down to D3cold, or
> currently unreachable because a PCIe port above it was suspended to D3hot
> so that the link is down. Those are transient issues, the device isn't
> removed in those cases.
Thanks for the info. I wasn't sure about making the removed return sticky
on a failed vendor id check, so I will remove that from this path and
resend the entire series.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-19 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 22:00 [PATCHv2 0/4] Limiting pci access requsets Keith Busch
2016-09-06 22:00 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] pci: Add is_removed state Keith Busch
2016-09-07 11:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-09-17 8:35 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-09-19 17:47 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-09-06 22:00 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] pci: No config access for removed devices Keith Busch
2016-09-07 12:03 ` kbuild test robot
2016-09-07 16:28 ` Keith Busch
2016-09-06 22:00 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] pcie/aer: Cache capability position Keith Busch
2016-09-07 11:30 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-09-13 22:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-06 22:00 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] pci/msix: Skip disabling removed devices Keith Busch
2016-09-07 13:28 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] Limiting pci access requsets Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160919174723.GA8000@keith \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=wzhang@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).