From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers/pci/hotplug: Support surprise hotplug
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:57:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160921165703.GA17457@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474460130-8316-5-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Gavin,
You don't need my ack for any of these, and I assume you'll merge them
through the powerpc tree.
Minor comments below, feel free to ignore them.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:15:30PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> ...
> @@ -536,9 +565,16 @@ static struct pnv_php_slot *pnv_php_alloc_slot(struct device_node *dn)
> if (unlikely(!php_slot))
> return NULL;
>
> + php_slot->event = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pnv_php_event), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (unlikely(!php_slot->event)) {
> + kfree(php_slot);
> + return NULL;
> + }
Since you *always* allocate the event when allocating the php_slot,
making the event a member of php_slot (instead of keeping a pointer to
it) would simplify your memory management a bit.
It seems to be the style in this file to use "unlikely" liberally, but
I really doubt there's any performance consideration in this code. To
me it adds more clutter than usefulness.
> +static irqreturn_t pnv_php_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct pnv_php_slot *php_slot = data;
> + struct pci_dev *pchild, *pdev = php_slot->pdev;
> + struct eeh_dev *edev;
> + struct eeh_pe *pe;
> + struct pnv_php_event *event;
> + u16 sts, lsts;
> + u8 presence;
> + bool added;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &sts);
> + sts &= (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
> + pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, sts);
I didn't realize that this is some sort of hybrid of native PCIe
hotplug and PowerNV-specific stuff. Wonder if there's any opportunity
to combine with or leverage pciehp. That seems pretty blue-sky
though, since there's so much PowerNV special sauce here.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-21 12:15 [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/powernv: PCI Surprise Hotplug Support Gavin Shan
2016-09-21 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/eeh: Allow to freeze PE in eeh_pe_set_option() Gavin Shan
2016-09-21 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/eeh: Export eeh_pe_state_mark() Gavin Shan
2016-09-21 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/powernv: Unfreeze PE on allocation Gavin Shan
2016-09-21 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers/pci/hotplug: Support surprise hotplug Gavin Shan
2016-09-21 16:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-09-22 10:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-09-26 13:08 ` Gavin Shan
2016-09-26 13:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160921165703.GA17457@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).