From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-1b.atlantis.sk ([80.94.52.26]:40434 "EHLO smtp-1b.atlantis.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223AbcJDRzE (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:55:04 -0400 From: Ondrej Zary To: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: 4.7 regression: ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:54:42 +0200 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PCI , wim@djo.tudelft.nl, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com References: <201609251512.05657.linux@rainbow-software.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201610041954.45680.linux@rainbow-software.org> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 01 October 2016 19:49:17 Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 9/30/2016 5:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> >> What's the drawback, if any? > >> > > >> > I don't see any drawback to be honest. > > > > I'd go for it then, if Bjorn doesn't hate it. > > I posted a follow up patch a minute ago. > > [PATCH 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce static IRQ array size to 16" > [PATCH 2/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts > [PATCH 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" > > Can we have some testing coverage? and eventually have tested-by? Fixes the problem on all 4 machines. These patches also need to go into 4.7-stable and 4.8-stable. Tested-by: Ondrej Zary -- Ondrej Zary