From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/5] pci: Add is_removed state
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:08:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161021170846.GA8633@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021162010.GB4221@wunner.de>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> I've found that the following simple change on top of your series is
> already sufficient to make hot-removal of the Apple Gigabit Ethernet
> adapter "just work" (no more soft lockups, which is a giant improvement):
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 5c43012..cc8b234 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *bus);
>
> static inline int pci_channel_offline(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> - return (pdev->error_state != pci_channel_io_normal);
> + return pdev->error_state != pci_channel_io_normal || pdev->is_removed;
> }
>
> struct pci_host_bridge {
>
>
> This got me thinking: We've got three pci_channel_state values defined
> in include/linux/pci.h, "normal", "frozen" and "perm_failure". Instead
> of adding a new "is_removed" bit to struct pci_dev, would it perhaps
> make more sense to just add a new type of pci_channel_state for removed
> devices? Then the above change to pci_channel_offline() wouldn't even
> be necessary. The pciehp and dpc drivers would just change the channel
> status to "removed" and all the drivers already querying it with
> pci_channel_offline() would pick up the change automatically.
>
> Thoughts?
I'd be happy if we can reuse that, but concerned about overloading
error_state's intended purpose for AER. The conditions under which an
'is_removed' may be set can also create AER events, and the aer driver
overrides the error_state.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-21 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 20:23 [PATCHv3 0/5] PCI access on removed devices Keith Busch
2016-09-27 20:23 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] mips/pci: Reduce stack frame usage Keith Busch
2016-09-28 13:43 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2016-09-27 20:23 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] pci: Add is_removed state Keith Busch
2016-10-21 15:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-21 16:15 ` Keith Busch
2016-10-21 16:36 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-21 16:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-21 17:08 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-10-21 16:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-21 17:30 ` Keith Busch
2016-09-27 20:23 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] pci: No config access for removed devices Keith Busch
2016-09-27 20:23 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] pcie/aer: Cache capability position Keith Busch
2016-09-27 21:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-27 20:23 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] pci/msix: Skip disabling removed devices Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161021170846.GA8633@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=wzhang@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).