From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PCI: Unfold conditions to block runtime PM on PCIe ports
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:28:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161025052832.GA5630@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161020141810.GM24289@lahna.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:18:10PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > The conditions to block D3 on parent ports are currently condensed into
> > a single expression in pci_dev_check_d3cold(). Upcoming commits will
> > add further conditions for hotplug ports, making this expression fairly
> > large and impenetrable. Unfold the conditions to maintain readability
> > when they are amended.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
>
> This actually results a functional change because now all the conditions
> are evaluated whereas previosly it bailed out immediately when the
> condition was true ;-)
You're right. That's a step backward, good catch.
I've reworked this commit to restore the old behaviour and will respin
after some more testing and comparing disassembler output.
Thanks!
Lukas
>
> Not that it matters here.
>
> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index a19056e..f1ddb6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -2270,19 +2270,20 @@ bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > static int pci_dev_check_d3cold(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
> > {
> > bool *d3cold_ok = data;
> > - bool no_d3cold;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * The device needs to be allowed to go D3cold and if it is wake
> > - * capable to do so from D3cold.
> > - */
> > - no_d3cold = dev->no_d3cold || !dev->d3cold_allowed ||
> > - (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) && !pci_pme_capable(dev, PCI_D3cold)) ||
> > - !pci_power_manageable(dev);
> > + /* The device needs to be allowed to go D3cold. */
> > + if (dev->no_d3cold || !dev->d3cold_allowed)
> > + *d3cold_ok = false;
> > +
> > + /* If it is wakeup capable it must be able to do so from D3cold. */
> > + if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) && !pci_pme_capable(dev, PCI_D3cold))
> > + *d3cold_ok = false;
> >
> > - *d3cold_ok = !no_d3cold;
> > + /* If it is a bridge it must be allowed to go to D3. */
> > + if (!pci_power_manageable(dev))
> > + *d3cold_ok = false;
> >
> > - return no_d3cold;
> > + return !*d3cold_ok;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 14:07 [PATCH 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 4/9] PCI: Activate runtime PM on a PCIe port only if it can suspend Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe hotplug ports Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: Don't acquire ref on parent in pci_bridge_d3_update() Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: Autosense device removal " Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: Speed up algorithm " Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 7/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Use cached copy of PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC bit Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] PCI: Unfold conditions to block runtime PM on PCIe ports Lukas Wunner
2016-10-20 14:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-10-25 5:28 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/9] PCI: Consolidate conditions to allow " Lukas Wunner
2016-10-19 14:07 ` [PATCH 8/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Make device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp() public Lukas Wunner
2016-10-20 14:27 ` [PATCH 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support Mika Westerberg
2016-10-20 23:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161025052832.GA5630@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).