From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:12:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161106171217.GA5922@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92ac10c1-84e4-0e73-a12d-69e66aac9c45@leemhuis.info>
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:43:33PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 26.10.2016 17:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 15:06 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> So the conclusion is to apply this patch now and go and look further @
> >> locking in a separate series right ? There's not much point in leaving
> >> Edison not booting as is the case with tip-of-tree right now.
> >
> > That's what I think is a summary of the discussion.
>
> Did anything happen after that conclusion? Just wondering, because this
> bug is on the list of regressions for 4.9 and I think the proposed fix
> hasn't reached mainline yet (or did I miss it?)
The patch still awaits merging through tip. I assume the x86 maintainers
were traveling (KS, LPC) or generally busy.
Thanks,
Lukas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-06 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-23 11:55 [PATCH v3 0/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops Lukas Wunner
2016-10-23 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Lukas Wunner
2016-10-23 12:37 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-10-23 14:57 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-23 16:25 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-10-24 9:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-24 10:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-24 11:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-25 6:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-26 14:06 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-10-26 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-11-06 13:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2016-11-06 17:12 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161106171217.GA5922@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).