From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 23:30:56 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Christoph Hellwig , tglx@linutronix.de, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] genirq/affinity: Introduce struct irq_affinity Message-ID: <20161108223056.GA26112@lst.de> References: <1478544462-9549-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1478544462-9549-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20161108212526.GF14322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20161108212526.GF14322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> List-ID: On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:25:27PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > What tree would you prefer? I vote for the IRQ tree since that seems > to be where the interesting parts are, and I think I acked all the PCI > bits. Yes, that would be my preference to. > > > + * struct irq_affinity - Description for auto irq affinity assignements > > + * @pre_vectors: Reserved vectors at the beginning of the MSIX > > + * vector space > > + * @post_vectors: Reserved vectors at the end of the MSIX > > + * vector space > > Maybe include something more informative than just "reserved", e.g., > "Don't apply affinity to @pre_vectors at beginning of MSI-X vector > space" or "Vectors at beginning of MSI-X vector space that are exempt > from affinity"? Sure.