From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lukas@wunner.de>
Return-Path: <lukas@wunner.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:10:57 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] PCIe port PM: high gloss polish & hotplug support
Message-ID: <20161118091057.GA12168@wunner.de>
References: <cover.1477611126.git.lukas@wunner.de>
 <20161118011515.GB25762@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20161118011515.GB25762@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:15:15PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:52:06AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Respin of this series to polish the runtime PM support for PCIe ports
> > that was added with v4.8, and extend it to native hotplug ports:
[snip]
> I applied these to pci/pm for v4.10, thanks!
> 
> I did make two changes to the changelog of the last patch: you
> mentioned the "subordinate" bus, and I changed it to "secondary".  We
> have often used "subordinate" to refer to the immediately-downstream
> bus, but that's slightly confusing because in the bridge spec,
> "subordinate" means the highest bus number downstream from the bridge,
> while "secondary" refers to the immediately-downstream bridge.  Am I
> making sense or confusing things more?

Indeed the secondary bus was meant here and I used "subordinate" only
because the attribute in struct pci_dev is named like this. :-)

Thanks,

Lukas