From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:38254 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751654AbcLHOFm (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:05:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:05:39 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Cao jin Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci-error-recover: doc cleanup Message-ID: <20161208070539.0f00ce71@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1481184974-12505-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1481184974-12505-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:16:14 +0800 Cao jin wrote: > The platform resets the link, and then calls the link_reset() callback > on all affected device drivers. This is a PCI-Express specific state > -and is done whenever a non-fatal error has been detected that can be > +and is done whenever a fatal error has been detected that can be > "solved" by resetting the link. This call informs the driver of the As far as I can tell, the original text was correct here; why do you think this change needs to be made? Thanks, jon