From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:48:52 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Lukas Wunner Cc: Kilian Singer , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: PCI: Revert "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports" Message-ID: <20170102144852.GE3353@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20161228161816.GA19653@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <2046793688.407.1483005524737.JavaMail.zimbra@quantumtechnology.info> <521048803.418.1483027350066.JavaMail.zimbra@quantumtechnology.info> <472708904.419.1483028422817.JavaMail.zimbra@quantumtechnology.info> <20161229175028.GA18510@wunner.de> <52715138.511.1483053634089.JavaMail.zimbra@quantumtechnology.info> <20161230000731.GB18700@wunner.de> <1180505121.522.1483056977880.JavaMail.zimbra@quantumtechnology.info> <20170102114040.GA20127@wunner.de> <20170102121019.GA3353@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170102121019.GA3353@lahna.fi.intel.com> List-ID: On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > I've checked the acpidump of this machine and it does not seem to be a > traditional Optimus machine. At least this one is missing the magic _DSM > which is used to gather capabilities of the graphics device. > > However, it does have _PR3 and it is attached to the device > (_SB.PCI0.PEG) itself, not the root port. Nah, actually PEG is the root port. So it certainly looks like a traditional Optimus machine.