From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PCIEASPM breaks PCIe on Marvell Armada 385 machine
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:02:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117210258.GH27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170117193414.GG27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:34:14PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Uwe, can you try:
>
> setpci -s <whatever-the-id-of-the-root-is-it's-blanked-out-in-the-above> \
> 0x50.w=0x60
>
> and see whether it remains alive (you can check by reading the root
> register 0x52.w - bit 12 should be set once bit 11 clears again.
For reference, this I got wrong...
0xf1041a04 bit 0 indicates link status (0 = link up, 1 = link down).
> If that's successful, maybe setting the common clock bit on the PCIe
> device is what's causing the problem, in which case:
>
> setpci -s 02:00.0 0x80.w=0x40
> setpci -s <whatever-the-id-of-the-root-is-it's-blanked-out-in-the-above> \
> 0x50.w=0x60
Having worked with Uwe over IRC, it seems that any request to retrain
causes the link to go down, either with or without the common clock bit
set:
# setpci -s 2.0 0x50.w=0x60
# setpci -s 2.0 0x52.w
0011
# memtool md 0xf1041a04+4
f1041a04: 00010201
... reboot ...
# setpci -s 2.0 0x50.w=0x20
# memtool md 0xf1041a04+4
f1041a04: 00010201
which doesn't point towards ASPM itself, but the problem is caused by
a side effect of ASPM's setup code which always triggers a retrain.
Bit 5 in that register is documented (at least in the Armada 370 docs
and Armada XP docs I have) as:
5 RetrnLnk RW Retrain Link
0x0 This bit forces the device to initiate link retraining.
Always returns 0 when read.
NOTE: If configured as an Endpoint, this field is
reserved and has no effect.
Bjorn, are you aware of similar situations where a request for the PCIe
link to be retrained causes it to fail?
Here, on my Armada 388, I can request a link retrain with or without the
common clock bit set and everything's happy (this is with an ASM1062 SATA
mini-PCIe card):
root@clearfog21:~# setpci -s 2.0 0x50.w=0x60
root@clearfog21:~# setpci -s 2.0 0x52.w
0012
root@clearfog21:~# /shared/bin/devmem2 0xf1041a04
Value at address 0xf1041a04: 0x00010100
root@clearfog21:~# setpci -s 2.0 0x50.w=0x20
root@clearfog21:~# setpci -s 2.0 0x52.w
0012
root@clearfog21:~# /shared/bin/devmem2 0xf1041a04
Value at address 0xf1041a04: 0x00010100
One curious observation I have noticed on Armada 388 is this behaviour:
root@clearfog21:~# setpci -s 2.0 0x50.l=0xffff0040 0x50.l 0x50.l=0x0fff0040 0x50.l
10120040
00120040
bit 28 is writable, which goes against the 370/XP docs:
28 SltClkCfg RO Slot Clock Configuration
0x1 0 = Independent: The device uses an independent clock,
irrespective of the presence of a reference clock
on the connector.
1 = Reference: The device uses the reference clock that
the platform provides.
It seems that this bit is _not_ read-only.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 19:49 CONFIG_PCIEASPM breaks PCIe on Marvell Armada 385 machine Uwe Kleine-König
2017-01-11 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-12 13:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2017-01-12 15:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-12 15:24 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-01-17 15:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-17 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-17 17:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-17 17:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-17 17:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-17 18:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-17 19:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-17 21:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-01-17 22:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-17 23:37 ` David Daney
2017-01-18 14:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-18 17:36 ` David Daney
2017-01-18 17:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117210258.GH27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).