linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>, Austin Bolen <Austin.Bolen@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 next 0/3] Limiting pci access
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 23:36:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170128073605.GA20114@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123160452.GA10771@localhost.localdomain>

Or to put it the other way around - why even start an operation
that will fail?

We have a pretty similar issue in file system land: A file system
must handle failure from the storage device at any time to provide
data integrity.  But that doesn't mean we can't optimize for the
case where a device is toast (host removed, fails any I/O, etc).
In that case we mark the file system as shutdown and stop submitting
more I/O, potentially avoiding up to hours of recovery time.

It would be helpful for everyone up and down the stack to do these
don't do anyting stupid if you can avoid it starting from the lowest
layers.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-28  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-28 22:58 [PATCHv4 next 0/3] Limiting pci access Keith Busch
2016-10-28 22:58 ` [PATCHv4 next 1/3] pci: Add is_removed state Keith Busch
2016-10-31 10:41   ` Lukas Wunner
2016-12-13 20:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:07     ` Keith Busch
2016-12-14  2:50       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-14  2:54         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:54     ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-28 22:58 ` [PATCHv4 next 2/3] pci: No config access for removed devices Keith Busch
2016-10-31 12:18   ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-28 22:58 ` [PATCHv4 next 3/3] pci/msix: Skip disabling " Keith Busch
2016-10-31 11:00   ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-31 13:54     ` Keith Busch
2016-12-13 21:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:01     ` Keith Busch
2016-11-18 23:25 ` [PATCHv4 next 0/3] Limiting pci access Keith Busch
2016-11-23 16:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-11-28  9:14     ` Wei Zhang
2016-11-28 10:22       ` Lukas Wunner
2016-11-28 18:02     ` Keith Busch
2016-12-08 17:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-08 19:32         ` Keith Busch
2016-12-12 23:42           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13  0:55             ` Keith Busch
2016-12-13 20:50               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:18                 ` Keith Busch
     [not found]                   ` <B58D82457FDA0744A320A2FC5AC253B93D82F37D@fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>
     [not found]                     ` <20170120213550.GA16618@localhost.localdomain>
2017-01-21  7:31                       ` Lukas Wunner
2017-01-21  8:42                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-21 14:22                           ` Lukas Wunner
2017-01-25 11:47                             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-23 16:04                           ` Keith Busch
2017-01-25  0:44                             ` Austin.Bolen
2017-01-25 21:17                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-26  1:12                                 ` Austin.Bolen
2017-02-01 16:04                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-02-03 20:30                                     ` Austin.Bolen
2017-02-03 20:39                                       ` Greg KH
2017-02-03 21:43                                     ` Austin.Bolen
2017-01-25 11:48                             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-28  7:36                             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-11-13  6:05                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-13 14:59                     ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170128073605.GA20114@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=Austin.Bolen@dell.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=wzhang@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).