Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: Question: PCIe DPC not allowing for link retraining and bus re-scan
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:52:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203205219.GE24601@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1FA01473@lhreml507-mbx>

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:35:47AM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > If my understanding is correct upon an incoming DPC event
> > the DPC IRQ handler will:
> > 1) stop and remove all the devices in the hierarchy under the
> > downstream port that raised the event
> > 2) wait for the data link to be inactive
> > 3) keep the downstream port status in DPC (in fact we set the DPC
> >    trigger status again here:
> >    http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-
> > dpc.c#L55)
> 
> As you can see above, after waiting for the link to be inactive
> we raise again a DPC event (according to PCIe3.0 6.2.10.1 we have
> DPC Interrupt Enable bit set to 1b and we set DPC Interrupt Status bit
> to 1b), also we keep the port in DPC status as we set also "DPC Trigger
> Status" to 1b. However this seems wrong to me as I would expect SW to
> clear "DPC Trigger Status" to allow the link to retrain and then to
> raise the Hot-plug event...
> 
> What do you think?

I think it's just fine as-is. These are defined as RW1C fields, meaning
write 1 to clear.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-03 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-30 11:56 Question: PCIe DPC not allowing for link retraining and bus re-scan Gabriele Paoloni
2017-01-30 16:14 ` Keith Busch
2017-01-31  9:35   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-01-31 15:53     ` Keith Busch
2017-01-31 16:59       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-02-02 23:22         ` Keith Busch
2017-02-03  8:26           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-02-03 10:35 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-02-03 20:52   ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-02-04  6:29     ` Gabriele Paoloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170203205219.GE24601@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox