From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: pciehp is broken from 4.10-rc1
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 00:34:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170204233443.GA234@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQUuFJHMScyFgnHbs5r-SzTiRiBZ2JcpUYJhg0ft75-OBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 01:44:34PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 09:12:54AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Section 6.7.3.4 of the PCIe Base spec seems to support the theory above,
> > so here's a tentative patch.
> >
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > Subject: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Don't enable PME on runtime suspend
>
> it works:
Thanks a lot for the report and for testing the patch!
@Rafael:
Bjorn usually wants you to ack PM-related patches. Looking at the
patch again I'm now thinking it might be cleaner to move the check
for is_hotplug_bridge into pci_dev_run_wake(). Thoughts?
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-04 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-03 4:11 pciehp is broken from 4.10-rc1 Yinghai Lu
2017-02-03 5:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-02-04 7:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-04 8:12 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-02-04 18:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-02-04 21:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-04 23:34 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2017-02-05 4:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-05 5:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-05 7:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-02-06 10:37 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-06 11:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-06 21:35 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-02-08 13:00 ` Erik Veijola
2017-02-08 17:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-02-06 18:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] ` <20170206204249.GA679@wunner.de>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQXSmB6Cs55nFtdw3rRrVrivwpDGNTwLwYtvWCEe4nsuHg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-07 6:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-02-07 18:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-08 8:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-18 23:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-02-19 1:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-19 2:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-02-06 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-03 15:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170204233443.GA234@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).