From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:26:51 -0500 From: Keith Busch To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Logan Gunthorpe , Myron Stowe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bjorn Helgaas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jonathan Corbet , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Emil Velikov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Guenter Roeck , Jarkko Sakkinen , Linus Walleij , Ryusuke Konishi , Stefan Berger , Wei Zhang , Kurt Schwemmer , Stephen Bates , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver Message-ID: <20170301222651.GA14852@localhost.localdomain> References: <1488091997-12843-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <20170301214120.GA30451@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170301214120.GA30451@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> List-ID: On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:41:20PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:53:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > Changes since v4: > > > > * Turns out pushing the pci release code into the device release > > function didn't work as I would have liked. If you try to unbind the > > device with an instance open, then you hit a kernel bug at > > drivers/pci/msi.c:371. (This didn't occur in v3.) > > This is in free_msi_irqs(): > > 368 for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) > 369 if (entry->irq) > 370 for (i = 0; i < entry->nvec_used; i++) > 371 BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i)); > > I don't think this is indicating a bug in the PCI core (although I do > think a BUG_ON() here is an excessive response). I think it's an > indication that the driver didn't disconnect its ISR. Without more > details of the failure it's hard to tell if the BUG_ON is a symptom of > a problem in the driver or what. > > An "alive" flag feels racy, and I can't tell if it's really the best > way to deal with this, or if it's just avoiding the issue. There must > be other drivers with the same cleanup issue -- do they handle it the > same way? I think this is from using the managed device resource API to request the irq actions. The scope of the resource used to be tied to the pci_dev's dev, but now it's the new switchec class dev, which has a different lifetime while open references exist, so it's not releasing the irq's. One thing about the BUG_ON that is confusing me is how it's getting to free_msi_irq's BUG in v4 or v5. I don't see any part releasing the allocated ones. Maybe the devres API is harder to use than having the driver manage all the resources...