From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI / PM: Add needs_resume flag to avoid suspend complete optimization
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:46:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170425094642.GA10128@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170425085507.GA3719@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:55:07AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:21:49AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:56:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 24, 2017 10:42:42 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:02:30PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:27:42PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > > > Some drivers - like i915 - may not support the system suspend direct
> > > > > > complete optimization due to differences in their runtime and system
> > > > > > suspend sequence. Add a flag that when set resumes the device before
> > > > > > calling the driver's system suspend handlers which effectively disables
> > > > > > the optimization.
> > > > >
> > > > > FWIW, there are at least two alternative solutions to this problem which
> > > > > do not require changes to the PCI core:
> > > > >
> > > > > (1) Add a ->prepare hook to i915_pm_ops which calls pm_runtime_get_sync()
> > > > > and a ->complete hook which calls pm_runtime_put().
> > > >
> > > > Thinking a bit more about this, it's even simpler: The PM core acquires
> > > > a runtime PM ref in device_prepare() and releases it in device_complete(),
> > > > so it's sufficient to just call pm_runtime_resume() in a ->prepare hook
> > > > that's newly added to i915. No ->complete hook necessary. Tentative
> > > > patch below, based on drm-intel-fixes, would replace both of your patches.
> > >
> > > Calling it in ->prepare() means that everybody is now waiting for you to
> > > resume.
> > >
> > > Not quite optimal IMO.
> >
> > Okay, understood.
> >
> > However in the absence of a device_link from the HDA device (consumer)
> > to the GPU (supplier), there's no guarantee that the GPU is resumed
> > when the HDA device needs it due to the asynchronous invocation of
> > the ->suspend hooks. This is assuming that the HDA device already
> > needs the GPU during ->suspend phase.
>
> i915 has ->resume_early and ->suspend_late hooks that provides the above
> guarantee.
Employing device links is preferable IMO:
* Less code. Just find the HDA device in your ->probe hook and call
device_link_add(). Alternatively do it from the HDA driver. Even
adding the link from both drivers should be fine. I can provide
you with an evaluation patch if you'd like.
* Avoidance of doing things behind the PM core's back.
* Takes care of more stuff than just system sleep (e.g. shutdown ordering).
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-25 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-24 14:27 [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI / PM: Add needs_resume flag to avoid suspend complete optimization Imre Deak
2017-04-24 14:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Prevent the system " Imre Deak
2017-04-24 20:16 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-04-25 10:28 ` Imre Deak
2017-04-27 14:17 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-04-24 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI / PM: Add needs_resume flag to avoid " Lukas Wunner
2017-04-24 20:42 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-04-24 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-25 6:21 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-04-25 8:55 ` Imre Deak
2017-04-25 9:46 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2017-04-25 10:22 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170425094642.GA10128@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).