From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 08:52:08 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Alan Cox Cc: Haiyang Zhang , "olaf@aepfle.de" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci-hyperv: Use only 16 bit integer for PCI domain Message-ID: <20170525082215.4736027d@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20170525141955.6cee8fbb@alans-desktop> References: <1495658355-13103-1-git-send-email-haiyangz@exchange.microsoft.com> <20170525141955.6cee8fbb@alans-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 25 May 2017 14:19:55 +0100 Alan Cox wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang > > > --- > > > > According to Stephen Hemminger , there are > > additional programs, like X.org, DPDK, are also using 16-bit only > > PCI domain numbers. So, I'm submitting this patch for re-consideration. > > The correct way to handle this is to send the needed patches to DPDK and > to X.org both of whom will I am sure be delighted to get it fixed in > their codebase. Both projects have stable ABI requirements. And the lead time to get the change propagated out to applications is long (>5yrs) even longer with the Enterprise distro's. As developers we can all just pass the buck but this doesn't help users in any reasonable time fram. It is not as simple as just making a patch or pull request for their upstream code bases.