From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: designware: Fix dw_handle_msi_irq() on 64-bit BE configs
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:46:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170720234613.GF18698@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1690 bytes --]
Commit 1b497e6493c4 "PCI: dwc: Fix uninitialized variable in
dw_handle_msi_irq()" fixed one problem for 64-bit architectures but
left another. The find_next_bit() function assumes native ordering of
bits within each word (unsigned long), so passing a pointer to a u32
variable will cause it to scan the following 32 bits on a 64-bit
big-endian configuration. Alternately it could result in an alignment
fault on some architectures.
Copy the status to an unsigned long variable before using
find_next_bit().
Fixes: 1b497e6493c4 ("PCI: dwc: Fix uninitialized variable in ...")
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
This is compile-tested only.
Ben.
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index d29c020da082..511fc9188f98 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_msi_irq_chip = {
irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
{
u32 val;
+ unsigned long bits;
int i, pos, irq;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
@@ -65,11 +66,11 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
&val);
if (!val)
continue;
+ bits = val;
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
pos = 0;
- while ((pos = find_next_bit((unsigned long *) &val, 32,
- pos)) != 32) {
+ while ((pos = find_next_bit(&bits, 32, pos)) != 32) {
irq = irq_find_mapping(pp->irq_domain, i * 32 + pos);
dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS + i * 12,
4, 1 << pos);
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-20 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 23:46 Ben Hutchings [this message]
2017-07-21 9:07 ` [PATCH] PCI: designware: Fix dw_handle_msi_irq() on 64-bit BE configs Dan Carpenter
2017-08-01 10:45 ` Joao Pinto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170720234613.GF18698@decadent.org.uk \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).