From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:08:56 +0200 From: Jan Glauber To: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] perf: cavium: Support memory controller PMU counters Message-ID: <20170727090856.GB15784@hc> References: <20170726153502.GE28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726154515.GA11453@hc> <20170726155548.GF28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726161949.GB15426@kroah.com> <20170726163049.GG28875@nazgul.tnic> <20170726173353.GB21705@kroah.com> <1a2eedea-040d-c746-eaf0-1d8085b3f2bf@gmail.com> <20170726200802.GA17722@kroah.com> <20170727051157.GA4525@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170727051157.GA4525@nazgul.tnic> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Suzuki K Poulose , Greg KH , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Daney , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:11:57AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:02:42PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > > Also, if a given configuration disables CONFIG_EDAC there is some hackery > > needed to get the perf portion of the driver included. > > Yes, and we don't do performance counters in EDAC. > > So you could add a small memory controller driver which does the > arbitration or fix the firmware. OK. As fixing the firmware will take quite some time I'll go for the memory controller driver that starts EDAC / PMU depending on their CONFIG_. What would be the proper location for the multiplexer? drivers/soc/cavium or drivers/misc? --Jan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel