From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bl2nam02on0076.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.38.76]:12069
        "EHLO NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751120AbdIMMBI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:01:08 -0400
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 05:01:03 -0700
From: Vadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David.Daney@cavium.com,
        jcm@redhat.com, Robert.Richter@cavium.com, Wilson.Snyder@cavium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: update cavium ACS quirk implementation
Message-ID: <20170913120103.GB17702@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1505217316-15702-1-git-send-email-Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20170912101545.01977624@t450s.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20170912101545.01977624@t450s.home>
Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

To my previous email, please ignore this for now:

> Would the resetting of RR/CR/UF/SV bits be more correct here ?

WBR,
Vadim