From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:51580 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751144AbdJEPxX (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:53:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:53:10 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , Nadav Haklai , Hanna Hawa , Yehuda Yitschak , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Antoine Tenart , =?UTF-8?B?TWlxdcOobA==?= Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: aardvark: improve compatibility with PCI devices Message-ID: <20171005175310.3c2dde95@windsurf.lan> In-Reply-To: <20170928125838.11887-1-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> References: <20170928125838.11887-1-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Bjorn, On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:58:31 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > This patch series brings a number of fixes to the pci-aardvark driver > that allows a much larger number of PCIe devices to be used. I sent the initial version of this patch series almost a month ago, and it consists of fixes that I would like to have in 4.14. Is there a specific problem with those patches that explains why they have been ignored? Or is it just lack of time? If there is any problem with the patches, please let me know, I am of course perfectly fine with reworking them as needed. Thanks a lot, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com