From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: pci-host-generic: add support for Synopsys DesignWare RC in ECAM mode
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:14:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010091419.GA5693@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_Sqkiz8kZC0ab09kS9+ifBYK9gJObTVC81ts8k+JuNKQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 10 October 2017 at 01:13, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 05:46:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:21:59PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:39:18PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> >> > > index 7d709a7e0aa8..01e81a30e303 100644
> >> > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> >> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> >> > > @@ -35,6 +35,43 @@ static struct pci_ecam_ops gen_pci_cfg_cam_bus_ops = {
> >> > > }
> >> > > };
> >> > >
> >> > > +static int pci_dw_ecam_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
> >> > > + int size, u32 *val)
> >> > > +{
> >> > > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
> >> > > +
> >> > > + /*
> >> > > + * The Synopsys DesignWare PCIe controller in ECAM mode will not filter
> >> > > + * type 0 config TLPs sent to devices 1 and up on its downstream port,
> >> > > + * resulting in devices appearing multiple times on bus 0 unless we
> >> > > + * filter out those accesses here.
> >> > > + */
> >> > > + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start && PCI_SLOT(devfn) > 0)
> >> > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> >> >
> >> > I think we should return 0xffffffff data here, as we do in other
> >> > similar accessors (dw_pcie_rd_conf(), altera_pcie_cfg_read(),
> >> > rockchip_pcie_rd_conf()).
> >> >
> >> > Actually, xilinx-nwl has a nice trick: it implements
> >> > nwl_pcie_map_bus(), which returns NULL for invalid devices. Then it
> >> > can use the generic accessors, and pci_generic_config_read() already
> >> > fills in ~0 for this case.
> >> >
> >> > What do you think of the following? I put it on my pci/host-generic
> >> > branch for now (pending your response and an ack from Will).
> >>
> >> I'd probably just inline the device check in pci_dw_ecam_map_bus directly,
> >> but either way:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >
> > Thanks. The reason I split out pci_dw_valid_device() is because there are
> > several other *_valid_device() functions in other drivers that do basically
> > the same thing, and I think it's useful to be able to see that they're all
> > similar, as opposed to being buried in the config accessor or map
> > functions, which vary a little more.
> >
> >> I'm assuming this is so small that there's no point in having a Kconfig
> >> option for these guys that depends on the generic host driver?
> >
> > Good question; I don't care either way.
>
> In this case, may I suggest we leave the patch as is? Neither of you
> seem to mind, and it will make /my/ life much easier, given that I
> don't have to chase distros to get this driver enabled in their kernel
> configs (unless we make if 'def_bool y', in which case it makes even
> less sense to add the Kconfig option in the first place).
Yup, I acked it as-is, just thought it was worth asking the question.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 16:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] PCI: add support for firmware initialized DesignWare RCs Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-06 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: pci-host-generic: add support for Synopsys DesignWare RC in ECAM mode Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-06 23:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-10-06 23:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-09 16:46 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-09 18:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-10 0:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-10-10 9:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-10 9:14 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-10-31 8:42 ` Cleaning up non-standard PCIe ECAM on Arm servers Jon Masters
2017-10-06 16:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: designware: add binding for Designware PCIe in ECAM mode Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171010091419.GA5693@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).