linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] PCI: Detach driver before procfs & sysfs teardown on device remove
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:35:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171011213007.12012.37774.stgit@gimli.home> (raw)

When removing a device, for example a VF being removed due to SR-IOV
teardown, a "soft" hot-unplug via 'echo 1 > remove' in sysfs, or an
actual hot-unplug, we first remove the procfs and sysfs attributes
for the device before attempting to release the device from any driver
bound to it.  Unbinding the driver from the device can take time.  The
device might need to write out data or it might be actively in use.
If it's in use by userspace through a vfio driver, the unbind might
block until the user releases the device.  This leads to a potentially
non-trivial amount of time where the device exists, but we've torn
down the interfaces that userspace uses to examine devices, for
instance lspci might generate this sort of error:

pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:01:0a.3/config
lspci: Unable to read the standard configuration space header of device 0000:01:0a.3

We don't seem to have any dependence on this teardown ordering in the
kernel, so let's unbind the driver first, which is also more symmetric
with the instantiation of the device.

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---

Am I missing any reason for the existing ordering?  Looking through
history, it seems that we've simply always had this ordering.  We're
dealing only with pci related device attributes, so I can't figure
how the current ordering protects us from any races.  Anyway, I'd
appreciate comments if there's something obvious I'm missing.  Thanks.

 drivers/pci/remove.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
index 73a03d382590..2fa0dbde36b7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	pci_pme_active(dev, false);
 
 	if (dev->is_added) {
+		device_release_driver(&dev->dev);
 		pci_proc_detach_device(dev);
 		pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files(dev);
-		device_release_driver(&dev->dev);
 		dev->is_added = 0;
 	}
 

             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-11 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-11 21:35 Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-10-25 13:51 ` [RFC PATCH] PCI: Detach driver before procfs & sysfs teardown on device remove Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171011213007.12012.37774.stgit@gimli.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).