From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@intel.com>,
Mario.Limonciello@dell.com,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] PCI: Open-code the two pass loop when scanning bridges
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:35:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171013183548.68283-3-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171013183548.68283-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The current scanning code is really hard to understand because it calls
the same function in a loop where pass value is changed without any
comments explaining it:
for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++)
for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus)
max = pci_scan_bridge(bus, dev, max, pass);
Unfamiliar reader cannot tell easily what is the purpose of this loop
without looking at internals of pci_scan_bridge().
In order to make this bit easier to understand, open-code the loop in
pci_scan_child_bus() and pci_hp_add_bridge() with added comments.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 7302cef51d3f..107052f1dad9 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2398,7 +2398,7 @@ void __weak pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
- unsigned int devfn, pass, max = bus->busn_res.start;
+ unsigned int devfn, max = bus->busn_res.start;
struct pci_dev *dev;
dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "scanning bus\n");
@@ -2420,9 +2420,17 @@ unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
bus->is_added = 1;
}
- for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++)
- for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus)
- max = pci_scan_bridge(bus, dev, max, pass);
+ /*
+ * Scan bridges that are already configured. We don't touch them
+ * unless they are misconfigured (which will be done in the second
+ * scan below).
+ */
+ for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus)
+ max = pci_scan_bridge(bus, dev, max, 0);
+
+ /* Scan bridges that need to be reconfigured */
+ for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus)
+ max = pci_scan_bridge(bus, dev, max, 1);
/*
* Make sure a hotplug bridge has at least the minimum requested
@@ -2739,7 +2747,7 @@ void __init pci_sort_breadthfirst(void)
int pci_hp_add_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct pci_bus *parent = dev->bus;
- int pass, busnr, start = parent->busn_res.start;
+ int busnr, start = parent->busn_res.start;
int end = parent->busn_res.end;
for (busnr = start; busnr <= end; busnr++) {
@@ -2751,8 +2759,13 @@ int pci_hp_add_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_name(dev));
return -1;
}
- for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++)
- busnr = pci_scan_bridge(parent, dev, busnr, pass);
+
+ /* Scan bridges that are already configured */
+ busnr = pci_scan_bridge(parent, dev, busnr, 0);
+
+ /* Scan bridges that need to be reconfigured */
+ pci_scan_bridge(parent, dev, busnr, 1);
+
if (!dev->subordinate)
return -1;
--
2.14.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-13 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-13 18:35 [PATCH v2 0/8] PCI: Improvements for native PCIe hotplug Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] PCI: Move pci_hp_add_bridge() to drivers/pci/probe.c Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] PCI: Do not allocate more buses than available in parent Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: Distribute available buses to hotplug capable bridges Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] PCI: Distribute available resources " Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] PCI: pciehp: Fix race condition handling surprise link down Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI: pciehp: Do not clear Presence Detect Changed during initialization Mika Westerberg
2017-10-13 18:35 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] PCI: pciehp: Check that the device is really present before touching it Mika Westerberg
2017-10-20 21:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-10-23 11:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-10-20 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] PCI: Improvements for native PCIe hotplug Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171013183548.68283-3-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=yehezkel.bernat@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).